Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 14, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sukhraj Singh vs State Of Haryana on 18 November, 2020

Author: Gurvinder Singh Gill

Bench: Gurvinder Singh Gill

             In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana
                              At Chandigarh



                                                       CRM-M-21568-2020 (O&M)
                                                       Date of Decision:-18.11.2020



     Sukhraj Singh                                                   ... Petitioner

                                      Versus

     State of Haryana                                                ... Respondent



     CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL



     Present:-    Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

                  Mr. Karan Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
                  assisted by ASI Charanjeet Singh.

                  (proceedings conducted through video conferencing)

                  *****

     GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)

1. The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in a case registered against him vide FIR No.83 dated 23.2.2020 at Police Station City Mandi Dabwali, Sirsa, District Sirsa under Sections 341, 342, 392, 34 of Indian Penal Code, wherein offences under Sections 395, 397, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201 & 120-B of Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of Arms Act were added lateron.

2. The FIR in question was lodged at the instance of Kashmir Singh wherein it has been alleged that he drives truck bearing registration No.RJ-19-GE3134 which belongs to Sonu. On 22.2.2020, he had started from Rama Refinery, Dabwali and was proceeding towards Sirsa after loading plastic seeds in his 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 18-11-2020 23:04:01 ::: (2) CRM-M-21568-2020 (O&M) truck, however, when he reached a little ahead of Dera Canteen, Dabwali a vehicle looking like Innova came in front of the truck and 4 persons alighted from the same and while one sat in the truck, the other 3 persons made him sit in their car. The person who sat in his truck drove away his truck while he was kept confined for about 45 minutes and thereafter he was left on the road after tying his mouth and hand. It is further the case of prosecution that subsequently the complainant got a supplementary statement recorded to the effect that he suspected that the vehicle used for commission of crime was Xylo bearing registration No.PB-02-BU-1757.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and has now been involved on the basis of a supplementary statement made by the complainant pertaining to involvement of a Xylo, although initially the vehicle stated to be involved was stated to be Innova like vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that it also remained unexplained as to how the complainant has now come up with the registration number of the vehicle allegedly involved in the crime. The learned counsel has further submitted that co-accused Angrej Singh, who is owner of said Xylo vehicle, has already been granted bail.

4. Opposing the petition, the learned State counsel, upon instructions from ASI Charanjeet Singh, has submitted that the petitioner and other members of his gang have been operating in the area committing similar type of offences and that another FIR No.614 dated 16.11.2019 under Section 341, 342, 365, 395 IPC, Police Station City Fatehabad, District Fatehabad had also been lodged against the petitioner. The learned State counsel has, however, informed that the petitioner has been behind bars since last more than 8 months and that 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 18-11-2020 23:04:01 ::: (3) CRM-M-21568-2020 (O&M) 'Challan' already stands presented and that the petitioner is not involved in any other case other than the aforesaid 2 FIRs.

5. I have considered rival submissions addressed before this Court.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and that the petitioner is not specifically named in the FIR nor the owner of Xylo vehicle and in any case he has been behind bars since last more than 8 months, further detention of the petitioner will not serve any useful purpose as conclusion of trial is likely to consume some time. The petition, as such, is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.



     18.11.2020                                           ( Gurvinder Singh Gill )
     pankaj                                                     Judge

     Whether speaking /reasoned        Yes / No

     Whether Reportable                Yes / No




                                         3 of 3
                      ::: Downloaded on - 18-11-2020 23:04:01 :::