Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 141]

Central Information Commission

Mrpio Sic Rajasthan Fd By Rakesh Sharma vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. on 6 May, 2014

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
                             website­cic.gov.in

                Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2013/000867/MP & 
                       CIC/MP/A/2014/000053 
 
Appellant                                  :     Shri Rakesh Sharma, 
Ghaziabad
Public Authority               :     OICL, Jaipur

Date of Hearing                :     6 May 2014 
Date of Decision               :     6 May 2014  
  
Facts:­ 

1. The   appellant,   Shri   Rakesh   Sharma,   submitted   two   RTI  applications   dated   21   January   2013   &   6   February   2013   before  the   Central   Public   Information   Officer   (CPIO),   Oriental  Insurance  Co. Ltd., New Delhi  & Jaipur  respectively; seeking  information   regarding   the   survey   report   submitted   by   the  surveyor   Shri   S.   P.  Goel;   his   appointment   etc.   w.r.t   to  his  claim made under fire policy no. 1999/827 & 1999/930, through  a total of 11 points. 

2. Vide   reply   dated   11   March   2013,   CPIO   denied   the  information sought by the appellant on the ground that legal  proceeding   were   going   on   in   the   matter..   Not   satisfied   with  the CPIO's reply, the appellant preferred appeal dated 8 March  2013 to the first appellate authority (FAA), alleging that he  had not been provided certified copy of information on point  no. 1 and unsatisfactory information on point no. 2 had been  provided   to   him   by   the   CPIO   concerned.     No   order   had   been  passed by the FAA in this case.

3. Not satisfied with the response of the public authority,  the appellant preferred second appeal before the Commission.  

4. The   matter   was   heard   today   via   videoconferencing.    The  appellant, Shri Rakesh Sharma, was present at the hearing in  person.  The  respondent,  Shri   R.K.   Rajpal,   FAA/Chief  Regional  Manager made submissions from Jaipur. 

6. The   appellant   submitted   that   no   information   has   been  provided by CPIO till date.

7. The   FAA   submitted   to   the   Commission     that   vide   letter  dated   10   April   2013   written   to   the   Commission,   it   has   been  submitted that the report  of the surveyors concerned was not  provided   as   the   matter   was   pending   before   the   High   Court.  However, as on date the said matter has been decided and the  information  may  be   provided  upon   the   payment   of  Rs   908/­   as  photo­copying charges.

8. The appellant agreed to deposit the same at the earliest.  Both the parties exchanged their respective email address and  phone numbers at the hearing.

Decision Notice

9.             The   Commission   directs   the   CPIO   to   provide   the  information to the appellant, upon payment of the photocopying  charges,   within  one  week   of  the  receiving   the   same   from  the  appellant.   The   CPIO  is   also  directed   to  provide  copy   of  the  letter   dated   10   April   2013   addressed   to   the   Commission  allowing the disclosure of information.

(Manjula Prasher)  Information Commissioner  Authenticated true copy (T.K. Mohapatra)  Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar  Tele.No. 011­26105027  Copy to: 

Central Public Information Officer The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd  3rd Floor, Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur­302001. 
First Appellate Authority  The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd  3rd Floor, Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur­302001. 
Shri Rakesh Sharma, 19­A, Vrindavan Gardan Extension, Sahibabad­201005, Ghaziabad, UP .