Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K.Pitchai vs The Commissioner on 7 August, 2017

Bench: K.K.Sasidharan, G.R.Swaminathan

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

Dated: 07.08.2017 

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN            
AND  
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN              

W.P(MD)No.8646 of 2011   

K.Pitchai                                                                            ...
Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner,  
   Madurai Corporation,
   Madurai.

2.George Benny                                                            ...    
Respondents  

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus  to direct  the first respondent
to demolish the illegal construction put up by the second respondent in the
vacant site left open as common in between the petitioner Plot No.T10 and
second respondent Plot No.T11 measuring North South about 81.6 feet on East 
and East West about 8 feet twin house type, Ellis Nagar, Tamil Nadu Housing
Board, Madurai.

!For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.S.Narendravasan 
For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Md.Mohideen, AGP for R1          
                                          No appearance for R2
                                        
:ORDER  

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) The writ petitioner seeks a direction for demolishing the illegal construction stated to have been put up by the second respondent herein in the vacant site left open as common pathway in Plot No.T10 and Plot No.11 measuring North South about 81.6 feet on East and East West about 8 feet twin house type, Ellis Nagar, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madurai.

2.It appears that the second respondent herein is a subsequent purchaser from the original allottee. The writ petitioner submitted a representation dated 24.06.2011 to the authorities. The first respondent Corporation is also seized of the matter from as early as on 27.05.2011. The first respondent has issued notice to the second respondent herein for removal of the offending construction. But no action was taken. Therefore the present writ petition came to be filed.

3.This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities to take follow up action pursuant to the earlier notice dated 27.05.2011. The first respondent shall issue notice to the second respondent to enable him to show cause and remove the offending construction, if cause is not shown within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

To The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

.