Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Kerala High Court

P.K.Kuruvilla (Thachara) vs State Bank Of Travancore on 20 October, 2009

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

        FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2016/20TH VAISAKHA  1938

                     RSA.No. 1321 of 2009 ( G)
                      -------------------------


 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 23/2008 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,KOTTAYAM
                          DATED 20-10-2009

 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 606/2006 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT ,KOTTAYAM
                          DATED 04-12-2007

APPELLANT-APPELLANT-PLAINTIFF:
-------------------------------
            P.K.KURUVILLA (THACHARA),
            A PARTNERSHIP FIRM DOING RATION WHOLE SALE BUSINESS,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.J.CYRIAC,
            THACHARA HOUSE, VADAKKUMBHAGAM KARA,, KUMARAKOM VILLAGE,
            KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.


            BY ADVS.SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)
                    SRI.AJEESH K.SASI

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT:
-----------------------------------

            STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE,
            REPRESENTED BY CHIEF MANAGER, (ADV) REGION-I,
            P.M.SREEDHARAN, ZONAL OFFICE, STATE BANK OF
            TRAVANCORE, KOTTAYAM.


               BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN
                  ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW

       THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON
20-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




vdv



                        K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
                  =====================
                         R.S.A No.1321 of 2009
              ==========================
                Dated this the 20th day of May, 2016

                              JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that the loan account maintained by the bank in respect of the subject matter of the suit has been closed and this appeal need not be proceeded with.

This appeal has become infructuous. Closed.

Sd/-

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE vdv/20/05/16