Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

D.K. Soni vs State Of Chhattisgarh 20 Wpc/1216/2018 ... on 30 April, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                          1

                                                                             NAFR

             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                WPC No. 1217 of 2018

        D.K. Soni S/o Late Ramji Prasad Soni, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Nawapara,
        Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
        Chhattisgarh

                                                                      ---- Petitioner

                                      Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Animal And Fishiculture
        Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur Chhattisgarh.,
        District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

     2. The Principal Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh Mahanadi Bhawan
        Mantralaya New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

     3. The Collector, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

     4. The Deputy Collector, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

     5. Dr. S. P. Singh, Posted As Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Ambikapur
        District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

     6. S.P. Kashyap, Assistant Veterinary / Area Officer, Office Of Deputy Director
        Veterinary Services Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

                                                                  ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Harish Khuntiya, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 30/04/18

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has made a complaint before respondents No. 1 and 2 against private respondents No. 5 and 6 regarding embezzlement of government funds which is pending consideration since 09.09.2017 and has not been decided till date.

2

2. Be that as it may, the officiating respondents are directed to consider and take decision on the petitioner's complaint expeditiously.

3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka