Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

C.M.S.Evangelical Suvi David vs The Inspector General Of Registration on 10 November, 2017

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 10.11.2017  

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN             

W.P(MD)Nos.12531 of 2012 &   
14532 of 2012 and 15881 of  2014 
and 
WMP(MD)Nos.1, 2, 2 & 3 of 2012,  
1 & 2 of 2013 and
1& 2 of 2014

WP(MD)Nos. 12531 of 2012 & 15881 of 2014   

C.M.S.Evangelical Suvi David
Memorial Higher Secondary  
School Committee,  
Regn.No.11/1967, 
New No.62/1982, rep by its
Secretary, S. Thomas Walker, 
Karisal, Ambasamuthram Taluk,  
Tirunelveli District.                                           ...  Petitioner
Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration
   Santhome, Chennai ? 600 028. 

2.The District Registrar,
   Registration Department,
   Cheranmadevi,Tirunelveli District.

3.The Chief Educational Officer,
   Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

4.The District Educational Officer,
   Cheranmadevi at Tirunelveli,
   Tirunelveli District.

5.S.David Stephen                                               ... Respondents

WP(MD)No.14532 of 2012   

C.M.S.Evangelical Suvi David
Memorial Higher Secondary  
School Committee,  
Regn.No.11/1967, 
New No.62/1982, rep by its
Secretary, S. Thomas Walker, 
Karisal, Ambasamuthram Taluk,  
Tirunelveli District.                                           ...  Petitioner
Vs.

1.The District Registrar,
   Registration Department,
   Cheranmadevi, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Chief Educational Officer,
   Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

3.The District Educational Officer,
   Cheranmadevi at Tirunelveli,
   Tirunelveli District.

4.S.David Stephen                                               ... Respondents

PRAYER in WP(MD)No.12531 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari,
calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the second
respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka. No.224/Aa2/2012 dated 13/07/2012 and  
Quash the same.  

PRAYER in WP(MD)No.14532 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Certiorarified Mandamus,
calling for the records relating to the order passed by the third respondent
in Na.Ka.No.3433.aa3/2012 dated 11.08.2012 and quash the same and direct the  
third respondent to administer the petitioner society and its schools till
the decision of the civil Court in O.S.No.109 of 2012 on the file of the
District Munsif, Seranmahadevi.

PRAYER in WP(MD)No.15881 of 2014: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari,
calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st Respondent in
his proceedings in Na.No. 16739/12/2012 dated 17.05.2012 and quash the same  
and pass such further or other orders.

!For Petitioner                 : Mr.V.Pannerselvam 
                                                                in all WPs
^For Respondents        : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen,   
                                            Additional  Government Pleader
                                             for R1 to R4 in WP(MD)Nos.         
                                                  12531/12 & 15881/14 and 
                                                  R1 to R 3 in WP(MD)No.14532/12  
                
                                        : Mr.S.Xavier Rajini
                                             for R5 in WP(MD)Nos.12531/12 &     
                                                        15881/14 and 
                                                  R4 in WP(MD)No.14532/12   

:COMMON ORDER      

These writ petitions have been filed for issuance of a Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating the orders impugned and to quash the same.

2.When the matters are taken up for hearing, it is submitted by both the parties that appeals against the impugned orders are pending and hence nothing survives for adjudication in this matter.

3.Recording such submission, these writ petitions are closed. No cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

To

1.The Inspector General of Registration Santhome, Chennai ? 600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Cheranmadevi,Tirunelveli District.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

4.The District Educational Officer, Cheranmadevi at Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

.