Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

C. Rajendran vs State Represented By on 11 December, 2020

Author: T. Ravindran

Bench: T. Ravindran

                                                                              Crl.O.P.No.19597 of 2020



                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED :        11.12.2020

                                                      CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. RAVINDRAN

                                             Crl.O.P.No. 19597 of 2020

                      C. Rajendran
                      S/o. Chennan                                                  ... Petitioner

                                                           Vs.

                      State represented by
                      The Inspector of Police
                      Central Crime Investigation Wing (CCIW), (CID)
                      Thiruvannamalai
                      Thiruvannamalai District
                      Crime No.8/2015                                              ... Respondent

                      Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,
                      praying to     issue a direction, directing the Judicial Magistrate-II,
                      Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District to dispose the discharge
                      petition in Cr.M.P. No.1004/2018 in C.C. No.292 of 2017 pending on the
                      file of the Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruvannamalai withinthe stipulated
                      time.
                                          For Petitioner         : Mr. G. Elanchezhiyan
                                          For Respondent         : Ms. M. Prabhavathi
                                                                  Additional Public Prosecutor

                      Page 1 of 6

http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                               Crl.O.P.No.19597 of 2020



                                                        ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been laid by the petitioner seeking for a direction to the Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruvannamalai, to dispose of the discharge petition in Cr.M.P. No.1004/2018 in CC No.292/2017 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruvannamalai, within a stipulated time.

2. The respondent police has laid the final report against the petitioner and the others in Crime No.8/2015 under Sections 408, 109, 477A, 120B, 471, 467 of IPC and the same had been taken cognizance by the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Tiruvannamalai, in CC No.292/2017.

3. Now according to the petitioner, he is no way connected with the crime involved in the abovesaid case and therefore, seeking for discharge from the abovesaid case, according to him, he has preferred the petition in Cr.M.P. No.1004/2018 and further stated that the respondent police has also filed the counter in the abovesaid Cr.M.P.. Even Page 2 of 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.19597 of 2020 thereafter, the court below has not disposed of the Cr.M.P. and the same is kept pending endlessly and hence, according to the petitioner, he has been necessitated to lay the Criminal Original Petition for appropriate reliefs.

4. On a perusal of the records placed before this court, it is seen that the petitioner has preferred the discharge petition in Cr.M.P. No.1004/2018 in CC No.292/2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruvannamalai. It is further noted that counter has been filed by the respondent in the abovesaid Cr.M.P. Considering the case status of the abovesaid case, it is seen that, thereafter, the Cr.M.P. is kept pending without any progress. In such view of the matter, the contention of the petitioner is that a suitable direction should be given to the court below for concluding the enquiry in the abovesaid discharge petition within a stipulated period.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor also submitted that a suitable direction may be given to the Court below for concluding the enquiry in the discharge petition as early as possible. Page 3 of 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.19597 of 2020

6. Considering the abovesaid factors in toto, in the fitness of things and in the interest of justice, in my considered opinion, a suitable direction should be given to the court below for concluding the enquiry in the abovesaid discharge petition.

7. For the reasons aforementioned, the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruvannamalai, is directed to conclude the enquiry in the discharge petition preferred by the petitioner in Cr.M.P. No.1004/2018 in CC No.292/17 pending on his file within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in accordance with law.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

11.12.2020 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order bga Page 4 of 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.19597 of 2020 To

1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District

2. State represented by The Inspector of Police Central Crime Investigation Wing (CCIW), (CID) Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District Crime No.8/2015

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

Page 5 of 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.19597 of 2020 T. RAVINDRAN, J.

bga Crl.O.P.No.19597 of 2020 11.12.2020 Page 6 of 6 http://www.judis.nic.in