Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Som Dutt vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd And ... on 29 April, 2015

Author: Jitendra Chauhan

Bench: Jitendra Chauhan

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                               CHANDIGARH

                                                      CWP No. 8140 of 2015 (O&M)
                                                      Date of decision: 29.04.2015

                    Som Dutt
                                                                                     ...Petitioner
                                          Versus

                    UHBVN Ltd. and others
                                                                                  ...Respondents

                    CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

                    Present:        Mr. Vishva Nath Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

                                           ****
                    Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)

By way of the instant writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to pay the interest according to the notification dated 20.02.2002 (Annexure P-5) on the delayed payment of pensionary benefits.

The learned counsel contends that for the redressal of his grievance, the petitioner had served legal notice dated 27.02.2015 (Annexure P-4), however, the same has not been decided so far. It is further asserted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the ratio of law laid down in The Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Irrigation Department, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh Vs. Hasan Singh Kanwar, 2010(1) SLR 788.

Keeping in view the prayer made in the petition, without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority, to decide the legal notice (Annexure P-4), in terms of Hasan Singh Kanwar's case, by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.


                    29.04.2015                                     (JITENDRA CHAUHAN)
                    sumit.k                                               JUDGE



KUMAR SUMIT
2015.04.29 16:05
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document