Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sougata Mondal @ Kalu @ Subrata vs The State Of West Bengal on 27 September, 2023

Bench: A.S. Bopanna, Sudhanshu Dhulia

                                                    1

     ITEM NO.3                               COURT NO.7                          SECTION II-B

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

          Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                    No(s).      6397/2023

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-02-2023
     in CRM (NDPS) No. 168/2023 passed by the High Court At Calcutta)

     SOUGATA MONDAL @ KALU @ SUBRATA                                             Petitioner(s)

                                                         VERSUS

     THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL                                                    Respondent(s)

     IA No. 101713/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT AND IA No. 101714/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     Date : 27-09-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA

     For Petitioner(s)              Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR
                                    Ms. Manisha Pandey, Adv.
                                    Mr. Rahul Kushwaha, Adv.
                                    Mr. Kaustubh Tripathi, Adv.
                                    Mr. John Thomas, Adv.
                                    Ms. Mani Mala Ror, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)              Ms. Mantika Haryani, Adv.
                                    Ms. Muskan Surana, Adv.
                                    Ms. Astha Sharma, AOR

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel for the respondent, we see no reason to interfere with the Signature Not Verified impugned order at this stage. However, we make it Digitally signed by Nisha Khulbey Date: 2023.09.27 15:20:30 IST Reason: clear that if the trial is not completed within a period of six months from this day, the petitioner herein, would be at liberty to renew his prayer 2 seeking bail before the Trial Court, which shall be considered, at that stage, on its own merits and in accordance with law without reference to the present orders.

Petition is accordingly, disposed of along with the pending application(s), if any.

     (NISHA KHULBEY)                          (DIPTI KHURANA)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR