Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Muhammed Mustafa vs The State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2014

Author: A. Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                           PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

            WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/28TH MAGHA, 1937

                                  WP(C).No. 6025 of 2016 (C)
                                     ---------------------------
PETITIONER :
---------------------

            MUHAMMED MUSTAFA
            S/O.UNNEEN, AGED 45 YEARS
            POONTHOTTATHIL HOUSE, KADANNAMANNA P.O.,
            MANKADA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

            BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR
                    SMT.SMITHA BABU

RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------

        1. THE STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
           INDUSTRIES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENTSECRETARIAT
           TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695 001.

        2. THE DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

        3. THE GEOLOGIST
           DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, MINI CIVIL STATION
           MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 121.

            R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 17-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:

Mn


                                                                        ...2/-
WP(C).No. 6025 of 2016 (C)
--------------------------------------

                                                      APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
-------------------------------------

EXT.P-1:             TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT
                     GRANTING MINING LEASE TO THE PETITIONER FOR EXTRACTION OF
                     LATERITE DATED 2.12.2014.

EXT.P-2:             TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 3RD
                     RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 18.9.2015.

EXT.P-3:             TRUE COPY OF THE CLARIFICATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND
                     RESPONDENT DATED 25.9.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :                            NIL
----------------------------------------------------------

                                                                   //TRUE COPY//



                                                                   P.A. TO JUDGE
Mn

            A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
     -------------------------------------------------------
               W.P.(C).No. 6025 of 2016
     -------------------------------------------------------
     Dated this the 17th day of February, 2016

                        JUDGMENT

The petitioner submits that he is having valid quarrying permit as on 09.01.2015. Therefore, he is entitled for movement permit without insisting for production of environmental clearance.

This Court is of the view that the Geologist shall verify whether the petitioner is having valid quarrying permit as on 09.01.2015. If the petitioner is having valid permit as on 09.01.2015, necessary O(A) forms shall be issued to the petitioner. However, this will be subject to the orders of the Honb