National Green Tribunal
Jasmeet Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 18 June, 2020
Author: Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench: Adarsh Kumar Goel
Item No. 04 Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
(By Video Conferencing)
Original Application No. 801/2018
(With Report dated 11.06.2020)
Jasmeet Singh Applicant(s)
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 18.06.2020
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, CHAIRPERSON
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON'BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER
ORDER
1. The issue for consideration is pollution of River Balad in Baddi industrial area in District Solan on account of leakage of Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP).
2. The matter was considered on several occasions earlier. Finally, on 14.01.2020, the Tribunal considered the report dated 06.11.2019 filed by the State PCB to the effect that violation of provisions of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 ("Water Act, 1974") was taking place by discharge of polluted effluents in the water bodies. The same is reproduced below for ready reference: -
"2.0 Inspection of CETP Baddi
i) The CETP is designed to treat five different categories of effluent as tabulated under 1 Sr. Category Sector of No of Units Consented No. Industry effluent quantity (in MLD)
1. I Food, Paper and 89 15.55 Textile
2. II Soap & Detergent 112 2.0
3. III Pharmaceutical 213 2.9
4. IV Dyeing 4* 2.0 M/s Auro Textile Unit - I, M/s Auro Dyeing Unit - I, M/s Winsome Textile Industries
5. V Electroplating, 31 0.042 Metal surface finishing Total 449 22.492 Say 23.00
ii) It was observed that at an average of 17 mld effluent is treated by the CETP, comprising equalization tank, primary settler, aeration tank, reaction tank, secondary and tertiary clarifier. The treatment process for each stream is appended with the report (Annexure IV).
iii) It was noticed that effluent of category IV is not reaching to its designated equalization tank. M/s Baddi Infrastructure Ltd., has informed that the dedicated pipe network to carry the effluent of category IV is blocked. The effluent of category IV is therefore being discharged through pipe network of Category I.
iv) It is also observed that the CETP is designed to treat category V effluent by mixing with category IV effluent to optimize the chemical consumption and to achieve effective treatment. Since, the effluent of category IV has been mixed with category-I, in the pipe network itself before reaching CETP, which has resulted in formation of a new complex effluent for which the CETP was not designed. Therefore, it could not able to deliver the desired results w.r.t. treatment and thus, effluents was in non-conformity with the standards, as per the monitoring results of HPPCB (Annexure-V). Besides, the effluent of category V remained effectively untreated throughout the CETP process.
v) The performance of CETP is being regularly monitored by HPPCB. The monitoring data (Annexure-V) indicate that the performance of the CETP is far from satisfactory for having not met the discharged standards. The data reveal that effluent quality does not conform the standards of Chloride (limit of 2 1100 mg/1 max.), Total dissolved Solids (TDS) (LIMIT OF 2100 MG/1 Mmax.) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (limit of 30 mg/1 max.).
vi) The CETP has provided online continuous effluent monitoring system for pH, Total Suspended Solids (TDS), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Total Organic Content (TOC) and data so recorded are linked with the server of HPPCB and CPCB.
While collecting the sample from the final outlet of tertiary clarifier and discharge point at River Sirsa, difference in colour of effluent was observed. The sample collected from the discharge point was lighter in colour than that of outlet of tertiary clarifier; giving rise to possibility of dilution. (Photograph: Plate-I)
vii) The Committee also recorded that the Textile Units, which are generating the effluent of Category IV, were earlier operating their own effluent treatment plants prior to commencement of CETP and found it viable to operate due to their scale of production.
viii) The designed treatment criteria of CETP are to treat effluent, stream-wise, following segregation at source, effluent of Category-I is mixed with Category-IV, resulted in alternation of criteria, hence treated effluent.
ix) For increasing the connectivity, the CETP has proposed of laying conveyance (pipeline) for a total length of 5.8 kms. The status is as under.
Sr. Location Stretch in Status of Remarks
No. meters permission
obtained
1. Zydus 1655 Permission Work has
Cadilla to granted by been awarded
Legacy Food HPPWD by M/s Baddi
on Baddi Infrastructure
Barotiwala Ltd vide letter
road dated 27-09-
2019.
(Annexure-VI)
2. Maplur- 2250 Permission
Baddi not granted
electrical by NHAI
substation
upto Bhud
near Maxtar
Bio Genics
Company
3. Bhud to Lehi 1900 Permission
granted by
HPWD
3
Total 5805
To safeguard the interest of environment from being deteriorated further and having understanding of pollution problem, its cause and remedial measures, the Committee recommends following:
i) Textile industries (SI. No.1 to 5, Table 1) engaged in dyeing-process generating effluent of Category-IV, as mentioned above for the purpose of designing and operating CETP, should stop its operations with immediate effect, until and unless the dedicated conduits supposed to carry the said effluent, is brought to back functional.
ii) These units shall resume operation of their ETP to impart effective treatment on effluent of Category-IV so as to meet the standards and shall pump treated effluent to the pipe network designated to carry effluent of Category-I for further treatment at CETP.
iii) These units shall resume operations only upon satisfactory performance of ETP which was brought back to functional and shall be monitored once in a month by HPCB.
iv) M/s Baddi Infrastructure including Ltd. is to ensure proper maintenance of CETP and its infrastructure including pipe network designed to receive effluents from member industrial units. M/s Baddi Infrastructure Ltd. has to ensure operation of CETP as per the defined protocol and in accordance to standard operating practice which is in place. In case, any variation (beyond the designed criteria) of effluent quality is noticed by CETP the same shall be brought to the knowledge of SPCB, in writing. The SPCB shall acknowledge the communications and shall act to identify the cause for taking all necessary steps for taking all necessary steps to eliminate/minimize such variation.
v) M/s Baddi Infrastructure Ltd. has to install activated carbon, pressure sand filters and ozonizer before the treated effluent is discharged. This refers the Detailed Project Report of CETP-Baddi, which finds mentioned of the system but has not been provided by M/s Baddi Infrastructure Limited.
Reference is made on the observations recorded by the Committee constituted by Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No.916/2018 in the matter of Sobha Singh and Others v/s State of Punjab and Others, wherein the Committee recommended that Rs.1.0 crore to be levied on CETP-Baddi as Environmental Compensation for untreated effluent discharged into River Sirsa. The CETP discharged, joining the river, has failed to meet Bio-assay Test (Toxicity on fish: 0% survival with 100% effluent for 96 hours). This would have caused impact on water and land (soil) environment, plants 4 and vegetation, aquatic life and human health all along downstream of CETP-Baddi.
Thus, Committee also recommends the following:-
vi) Environmental compensation (EC) to be levied to CETP-Baddi (M/s Baddi Infrastructure Ltd) for not having done effluent treatment upto the standards and to those Textile Industries (dyeing units) responsible for making CETP defunct. The EC would be proportionate as under.
a) CETP-Baddi has to pay environmental Compensation t the tune of Rs.1.91 Crores for non-compliance of discharged standards, estimated based on violation recorded by HPPCB over last one and half year [19.10.2017 -
01.11.2019] (Annexure VII) including compensation to the tune of Rs.87.9 Lakh imposed by HPSPCB dated 15.10.2019 over one year [20.11.2018 to 09.09.2019] ( annexure VIII).
b) Textile Industries (dyeing units) are to pay establishment cost of CETP and cost of pipe network which was brought to state of irreparable.
vii) HPPCB is to review the notification, dated 17.03.2018 wherein Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Oil & Grease and pH have been notified TDS, BOD, Chloride and Sulphide may also be considered for inclusion in the notification as these have critical bearing on operation and performance of CETP designed to impart effective treatment. HPPCB may undertake similar exercise as done in case of notification, dated 29.06.2019 for CETP Paonta Sahib, wherein eight parameters including those referred here, have been considered. Such notification may be issued in consultation with CPCB.
viii) For optimal performance of CETP-Baddi, HPPCB is to ensure regulating and monitoring mechanism be in place by asking all member units (falling under red category) of CETP to install online continuous effluent monitoring system. The data so recorded shall be made available on SPCB and CPCB server for effective control."
3. The Tribunal directed the State PCB to take requisite steps to ensure that deficiencies are remedied by preparing an appropriate action plan.
4. In pursuance of above, the State PCB has filed a 'compliance report' dated 11.06.2020 to the effect that the units gave action plans which are not satisfactory as long timeline have been prescribed.
55. We do not find the report to be as per the mandate of law. If the pollution is continuing, the State PCB is under obligation to close the polluting activities by exercising its jurisdiction under the Water Act, 1974 and recover compensation from the polluters. Till pollution is stopped, polluting activities, which are punishable crime under the law, cannot continue. The State PCB has failed to take action merely on the ground that action plan was being prepared or had been prepared which was not satisfactory. None appears for the State PCB.
6. The State PCB may take appropriate action against the CETP operator and other polluters for the violation of law and furnish a compliance report within one month from today by e-mail at judicial-
[email protected] preferably in the form of searchable PDF/ OCR Support PDF and not in the form of Image PDF.
A copy of this order sent to the State PCB for compliance by e-mail.
List for further consideration on 25.08.2020.
Adarsh Kumar Goel, CP Sheo Kumar Singh, JM Dr. Nagin Nanda, EM June 18, 2020 Original Application No. 801/2018 A 6