Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

M/S. J.K.Exim vs The Principal Commissioner Of Customs on 21 September, 2016

Author: T.S.Sivagnanam

Bench: T.S.Sivagnanam

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated  :    21.09.2016
Coram

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam

Writ Petition No.21797 of 2016
and
W.M.P.Nos.18642 and 18643 of 2016

	M/s. J.K.Exim	
	rep. by its Proprietor,
	Shri. Kalpesh B.Patel. 	...Petitioner

Vs.

1.	The Principal Commissioner of Customs
	Chennai III Commissionerate,
	Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai,
	Chennai - 600 001.

2.	The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (SIIB)
	Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai,
	Chennai - 600 001.	

3.	The Inspector ( Prev - SIIB)
	Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai,
	Chennai - 600 001.
    ...Respondents

	Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for  issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records, pertaining to the impugned seizure Mahazar, dated 11.02.2016, issued by the third respondent. 

		For Petitioner	    :    Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan

	          For Respondents         :   Mr.A.P.Srinivas
					         Senior  Standing Counsel

O R D E R

Heard Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel, for respondents.

2. In this Writ Petition, though the petitioner challenges the seizure Mahazar, dated 11.02.2016, issued by the third respondent, subsequently, on instructions from the client/petitioner, would submit that the petitioner does not propose to challenge the mahazar, and would agree to certain contentions, so that the goods can be exported, as show cause notice, dated 05.08.2016, has been issued.

3. As rightly pointed out by the learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the respondents the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is slightly different, and if the petitioner seeks for any direction for exportation of the goods, he should file separate Writ Petition.

4. Accordingly, the challenge to the seizure mahazar is held to be not maintainable, and this Writ Petition is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to file fresh Writ Petition seeking for appropriate direction for exportation of the goods. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

21.09.2016 sd To

1. The Principal Commissioner of Customs Chennai III Commissionerate, Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (SIIB) Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

3. The Inspector ( Prev - SIIB) Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

T.S.Sivagnanam, J.

sd Writ Petition No.21797 of 2016 21.09.2016