Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Hardeep Singh Being Legal Heir Of Late ... vs Income Tax Officer Ward 68(5) New Delhi & ... on 3 June, 2022

Author: Manmohan

Bench: Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

                              $~20
                              *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                              +      W.P.(C) 9297/2022 & C.M.No.27864/2022
                                     HARDEEP SINGH BEING LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SARDAR
                                     SAWARUP SINGH                              ..... Petitioner
                                                  Through: Mr.Yogesh K.Jagia with Mr.Rishabh
                                                           Nangia, Advocates.
                                                  versus

                                     INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 68(5) NEW DELHI & ANR.
                                                                                           ..... Respondents
                                                        Through:     Mr.Satish Kumar Agarwal, senior
                                                                     standing counsel for the Revenue with
                                                                     Mr.Tushar Gupta and Mr.Utkarsh
                                                                     Tiwari, Advocates.
                              CORAM:
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
                              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
                                                ORDER

% 03.06.2022 Present writ petition has been filed by the legal heir of the asseessee challenging the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short 'the Act'] as well as order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act both dated 12th April, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2018-19.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned order and notice are void ab initio as they have been issued in the name of a dead assessee. He states that vide letter dated 23rd March, 2022 the Petitioner informed the Respondents that the assessee had expired on 19th January, 2022. He further states that despite informing the authorities regarding the death of the assessee, the Respondents issued a show cause notice dated Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:06.06.2022 16:23:59 24th March, 2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Act to the dead assessee. He relies upon the judgments of this Court in Savita Kapila vs. Assistant CIT (2020) 118 taxmann.com 46 (Delhi) as well as in Mrs. Sripathi Subbaraya Manohara L/H late Sh. Sripathi Subbaraya Gupta vs. Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax-22, New Delhi and Anr., W.P.(C) No. 2678/2020.

Issue notice. Mr.Sunil Kumar Agarwal, standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-revenue. He states that he would file a counter affidavit to distinguish the judgments relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the respondents are given liberty to file a counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing.

List on 06th September, 2022.

Till further orders, there shall be a stay of the reassessment notice as well as the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act both dated 12th April, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2018-19.

MANMOHAN, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J JUNE 3, 2022 KA Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:06.06.2022 16:23:59