Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

K.G. Laila Aged 76 Years vs T.K. Mohandas on 17 January, 2017

Author: Sathish Ninan

Bench: Sathish Ninan

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT:

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN

   TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/27TH POUSHA, 1938

                   CRP.NO. 481 OF 2013 ()
                   -----------------------
          (E.A. NO.29 OF 2013 IN E.P. NO.68 OF 2012
   IN O.S. NO.44 OF 2006, PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOCHI)

REVISION PETITIONER(S)/REVISION PETITIONERS:
--------------------------------------------

          1. K.G. LAILA AGED 76 YEARS
       W/O.T K MOHANDAS, THARAMMEL HOUSE, NEAR CEMETERY
       MURIKKUMPADARRI, DESOM, PUTHUVIPE VILLAGE
       KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DIST

          2. T K MOHANDAS AGED 80 YEARS
       S/O.LATE KUMARAN, THARAMMEL HOUSE, NEAR CEMETERY
       MURIKKUMPADAM DESOM, PUTHUVIPE VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK
       ERNAKULAM DIST

          3. LEENA T M AGED 34 YEARS
       D/O.T K MOHANDAS, THARAMMEL HOUSE, NEAR CEMETERY
       MURIKKUMPADAM DESOM, PUTHUVIPE VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK
       ERNAKULAM DIST

       BY ADVS.SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN
                        SRI.M.S.IMTHIYAZ AHAMMED
                        SRI.M.N.MANMADAN
                        SRI.A.RAJAGOPALAN

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
--------------------------

       T.K. MOHANDAS
       S/O.LATE KUMARAN, THOTTUNGAL HOUSE
       MURIKKUMPADAM DESOM, PUTHUVIPE  VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK
       ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 643.

       R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN
       R1 BY ADV. SRI.JAMES ABRAHAM (VILAYAKATTU)

       THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON  17.01.2013,    THE  COURT  ON  THE  SAME  DAY  PASSED  THE
FOLLOWING:



                 SATHISH NINAN, J.
          ===================================
                 C.R.P. No.481 of 2013
          ===================================
        Dated this the 17th day of January, 2017

                      O R D E R

Smt.Seena P., learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. The above submission is recorded.

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

SATHISH NINAN, JUDGE. Vsv /true copy/ P.S. To Judge