Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Babie Ramaswamy vs The Principal Commissioner And on 19 February, 2026

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                                       WP No. 50286 of 2025


                                  0IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED: 19-02-2026
                                                         CORAM
                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
                                             WP No. 50286 of 2025
                                                      &
                                          WMP Nos.50286 & 56277 of 2025

                R.Babie Ramaswamy
                S/o.R.Govindharajan,
                No.169, State Bank Officers Colony,
                Meyyanur,Salem- 636 004.
                                                                                         ..Petitioner(s)
                                                              Vs
                1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER and
                   Commissioner of Land Reforms,
                   Chepauk, chennai- 600 005.
                2. The Assistant commissioner /
                   Competent authority (Urban Land Ceiling)
                   Sannadhi Street,
                   Poonamallee Chennai- 600 056.

                3. The Tahsildar
                   Poonamalee Taluk,
                   Poonamalee.

                                                                           ..Respondent(s)
                PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                India, seeking for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
                records of the Respondents, especially the order dated 31.01.1992 passed by the
                2nd Respondent Under Section 9 (5) vide Na.Ka. 3731/ 91D and Notice dated
                10.02.1993 issued Under Section 11 (5)                   of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land
                (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 in respect of land measuring 2400 Sq.ft
                bearing Plot No.14 of Shanmuga Nagar, Comprised in Survey No.36/9 of
                Numbal Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District, and quash the same,
                and treat the proceedings as abated under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Urban

                                                                                               __________
                                                                                                Page1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 07:23:41 pm )
                                                                                             WP No. 50286 of 2025


                Land (ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, (Act 20 of 1999) so as to enable the
                Respondents especially the 3rd Respondent, to incorporate the name of the
                Petitioner as owner of the land measuring 2400 Sq. ft of bearing Plot NO.14 of
                Shanmuga Nagar, comprised                  in New Survey No.36/9 of Numbal Village,
                Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District.
                              For Petitioner(s):               Mr.V.Ramesh
                                                               for Mr.R.Ashwanth

                              For Respondent(s):               Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, AAG,
                                                               Assisted by Mr.Abishek Murthy, GA


                                                               ORDER

The petitioner challenges the proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 (the TN Urban Land Ceiling Act) and seeks to treat such proceedings as abated under Section 4 of the statute.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on earlier order dated 23.11.2021 in W.P.No.11690 of 2006 and related cases, as affirmed in judgment dated 27.07.2023 in W.A.No.1846 of 2023 and related cases. He points out that the challenge therein was also in respect of lands in S.No.36/9.

3. Learned Additional Advocate General concurs that the present writ petition also pertains to lands in S.No.36/9 which are covered in proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.3731/91/D. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 07:23:41 pm ) WP No. 50286 of 2025

4. In order dated 23.11.2021, this Court concluded that physical possession was not taken by initiating action under Section 11(6) of the TN Urban Land Ceiling Act and that proceedings abated in view thereof. This position was affirmed by the Division Bench in appeal. Since such proceedings pertain to the same survey number and are covered under File Number Na.Ka.No.3731/91/D, the petitioner is entitled to the same relief. Therefore, this petition is allowed as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

19-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No KAL __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 07:23:41 pm ) WP No. 50286 of 2025 To

1. The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, chennai- 600 005.

2. The Assistant commissioner / Competent authority (Urban Land Ceiling) Sannadhi Street, Poonamallee Chennai- 600 056.

3. The Tahsildar Poonamalee Taluk, Poonamalee.

__________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 07:23:41 pm ) WP No. 50286 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

KAL WP No. 50286 of 2025 & WMP Nos.50286 & 56277 of 2025 19-02-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 07:23:41 pm )