Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Manmohan Raj Bindra vs State (Govt. Of Nct) Of Delhi & Ors on 14 January, 2019

Author: R.K.Gauba

Bench: R.K.Gauba

                                                   SHAKUN ANAND

                                                   24.01.2019 11:03

$~10, 11, 12
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+     CRL.M.C. 2448/2016 and Crl. MA 10495/2016
      MANMOHAN RAJ BINDRA                      ..... Petitioner
                 Through: Mr. D.S. Vohra, proxy counsel for Mr.
                 Chirag Jamwal, Advocate

                             versus

      STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI & ORS         ..... Respondents
                    Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State
                    Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma, Adv. for R-2 to 4
                    Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Adv. for R-5

+     CRL.M.C. 706/2018 and Crl. M.A. 2528-2529/2018
      MANMOHAN RAJ BINDRA                      ..... Petitioner
                 Through: Mr. D.S. Vohra, proxy counsel for Mr.
                 Chirag Jamwal, Advocate

                             versus

      THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents
                   Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State
                   Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Adv. for R-2

+     CRL.M.C. 707/2018 and Crl. M.A. 2530-2531/2018
      MANMOHAN RAJ BINDRA                      ..... Petitioner
                 Through: Mr. D.S. Vohra, proxy counsel for Mr.
                 Chirag Jamwal, Advocate
                             versus
      THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents
                    Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State

CRL.M.C. 2448/2016 & conn.                         page 1 of 2
       CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
                   ORDER

% 14.01.2019 These three petitions arise out of proceedings in criminal complaint case (no.619347/2016) of the petitioner. While these petitions have been pending against earlier orders of the court of Magistrate and the court of revision, the criminal complaint has been dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 26.02.2018. A copy of the said order has been placed on record by the respondents in Crl. MC 707/2018.

On being asked, the counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly concedes that to be the result of the criminal complaint. The said decision on the criminal complaint by the Metropolitan Magistrate renders the petitions against the earlier orders infructuous. The petitions and the applications filed therewith are dismissed accordingly.


                                                  R.K.GAUBA, J
       JANUARY 14, 2019
       yg
CRL.M.C. 2448/2016 & conn.                               page 2 of 2