Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.K S Budhraja vs Punjab National Bank on 12 February, 2014

                  Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
          Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254  Website­cic.gov.in

                  Appeal: No. CIC/SM/A/2012/000324/MP
 
Appellant                                 :     Shri K S Budhraja, 
Delhi  
Public Authority              :     PNB, New Delhi

Date of Hearing               :     12 February 2014 

Date of Decision              :     12 February 2014   
  
Facts:­ 

1. The   appellant,   Shri   K   S   Budhraja,   has   submitted   RTI  application dated 14 September 2011 before the Central Public  Information   Officer   (CPIO),   Punjab   National   Bank,   RTI   Cell  MARD: Head Office, New Delhi; seeking information relating to  the   list   of   employees   who   have   been   appointed   in   "Clerical  Grade"  through  selection by e­BSRB in December  1979/1980 and  as "Management Trainee"   in November 1983 through total of 2  points.

2. Vide   order   dated   15   October   2011,   CPIO   informed   the  appellant   that   they   have   taken   up   the   matter   with   the  Division   concerned but the information is still awaited and  is likely to take some more time, therefore they will shortly  say   within   20   days,   reply   to   the   appellant.   The   appellant  preferred   appeal   dated   21   December   2011,   to   the   First  Appellate   Authority   (FAA),   when   he   didn't   receive   any  information from the CPIO concerned in spite of  the assurance  given  by the CPIO vide letter dated 15 October  2011. In the  meanwhile, vide order dated 26 November 2011, CPIO denied the  information on the ground that the information sought is more  than 20 years old and the same is not available. The FAA has  not passed any order in this case. 

3. Being  aggrieved and not satisfied  by the above response  of the public authority, the appellant preferred second appeal  before the Commission.  

4. The   matter   was   heard   today.   The   appellant,   Shri   K   S  Budhiraja,     was   present   in   person   and   made   submissions.   The  respondent Shri   Mohan Singh, CPIO and Chief Manager was also  present at the hearing in person. The appellant submitted that               information has not been provided and   a routine reply given  to   him   by   the   CPIO.     The   respondent   submitted   that   the  information sought for is more than 20 years old.  They will,  however,   check   with     their  Human   Resource   Development  Department  regarding   the   availability   of   this   information   or  otherwise.  

Decision Notice

5. The   Commission   directs   the   CPIO   to     consult   their  HRD  Department  to   find  out  if   the   information   sought   for   by   the  appellant is available with them, and if available, provide it  to   the   appellant   within   30   days   of   the   receipt   of   the  Commission's order.   

  

(Manjula Prasher) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­    Central Public Information    Officer      Punjab National Bank, H.O   Management Audit & Review  Division,  Rajendra Bhawan, Rajendra Place,  New Delhi Mr. K S Budharaja, 66­A, B -U & V, Shalimar Bagh,  Delhi­110088              First Appellate Authority    Punjab National Bank, H.O  Management Audit & Review  Division,  Rajendra Bhawan, Rajendra Place,  New Delhi