Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

R.Krishnankutty Nair vs The Secretary To Government

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

           WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937

                                   WP(C).No. 29668 of 2015 (G)
                                      ----------------------------
PETITIONER :
---------------------

            R.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, AGED 72 YEARS
            S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, RAGAM, PERUKAAVU
            VILAVOORKKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

            BY ADVS.SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA)
                          SRI.S.VINODKUMAR (VANCHIYOOR)

RESPONDENTS :
--------------------------

        1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
            LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT(RA), DEPARTMENT
            GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

        2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
            CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKUNNU,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

        *3. THAHASILDAR
            NEYYATTINKARA TALUK OFFICE
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. (*CORRECTED)

        4. VILAVOORKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-695571.

            R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 30-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:

Mn

              The address of the 3rd respondent is corrected as 'Addl. Thahasildar,
              Kattakada, Thiruvananthapuram District' as per order dated 21/12/15
              in I.A. No. 18126/15.




                                                                   Sd/- Assistant Registrar

                                                                                        ...2/-

WP(C).No. 29668 of 2015 (G)
-----------------------------------------

                                                      APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
-------------------------------------

EXT. P1:-            TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT IN SY.NO. 226/4-2 OF
                     VILAVOORKKAL VILLAGE.

EXT. P2:-            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER 54232/R.A1/2013 DTD. 2/1/2014.

EXT. P3:-            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. A4/818/2014 FORWARDED BY THE
                     4TH RESPONDENT TO IST RESPONDENT DTD .12/2/2014.

EXT. P4:-            TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT NO. SC4/2014/SRT OF THE
                     SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTICORRUPTION
                     BUREAU, SOUTHERN RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT DTD.
                     5/5/2014.

EXT. P5:-            TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FORWARDED BY THE
                     PETITIONER TO THE HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA DTD.
                     21/7/2014.

EXT. P6:-            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO
                     THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 21/7/2014.

EXT. P7:-            TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. 47766/R.A.1/2014 DTD. 25/7/2014.

EXT. P8:-            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 53/D3/2015/VIGI DTD. 6/1/2015.

EXT. P9:-            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 25/2/2015 OF THE 2ND
                     RESPONDENT.

EXT. P10:-           TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 18/5/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS                       :       NIL
-----------------------------------------------------------

                                                                       //TRUE COPY//




                                                                      P.S. TO JUDGE
Mn



                         A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                              W.P.(C).No. 29668/2015
                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                   Dated this the 30th Day of September, 2015

                                 J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, alleging encroachment into public pathway by some of the residents on the either side of road, had approached the Authorities. He relies on Exhibit P4 report of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau. The He has also approached the District Collector to take appropriate action.

2. This Court is of the view that the third respondent shall after adverting to the vigilance report and other appropriate materials take a decision after hearing the petitioner and the persons who have encroached upon the public property. Needful shall be done with two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Sd/-

(A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE) ms