Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 33, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sunil Dudi vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 August, 2023

Author: Rajendra Prakash Soni

Bench: Rajendra Prakash Soni

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
      S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 9266/2023

Sunil Dudi S/o Sh. Opa Ram Vishnoi, Aged About 32 Years, R/o
Matwalon Ki Dhani, Balasati, P.s. Bilara, District Jodhpur.
(Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Ajmer)
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :    Mr. Vikas Balia, Sr. Advocate
                               Mr. Manish Pitaliya
For Respondent(s)         :    Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, PP
                               Mr. J.S. Choudhary, Sr. Advocate
                               assisted by Mr. Pradeep Choudhary
                               Mr. Kishan Lal, Add. S.P., Shahpura,
                               Bhilwara



      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI

                                    Order

18/08/2023
1.   Arrested in furtherance of investigation into FIR No.55/2021,

registered at Police Station Rayala, District Bhilwara, petitioner

has filed this second application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for

releasing him on bail. After investigation into the matter, besides

petitioner, various other accomplices are charged for various

offences under various Acts. The petitioner is charge sheeted for

offence under Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act. The first application

of the applicant for bail was disposed of without considering the

merits of the case since it was not pressed by the petitioner.

2.   Before I proceed to examine the rival contentions in

connection with the questions of bail, it would be appropriate to

briefly state the facts of the present case which are that on

                    (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM)
                                     (2 of 8)                    [CRLMB-9266/2023]


11.04.2021 at about 11.52 p.m. Gaj Raj, S.H.O. of police station

Rayala (District Bhilwara) received a telephonic information that

some unknown miscreants had fled away in two Scorpio cars and

two Isuzu pickups after firing at the police team in the Kotri police

station area of Bhilwara District. Both the Pickup may be found

loaded with contraband drugs. At around 2:00 a.m. a Scorpio car

bearing registration number RJ-15-UB-1010 and a tarpaulin

covered Isuzu pickup bearing registration number RJ-06-GB-3350

came at a high speed which were chased by police party. After

some time, both Isuzu pickup and Scorpio cars were found parked

outside the village Liradiya Kheda with two persons with weapons

in their hands standing on both sides of each vehicle. On being

challenged by the police, all of them started firing on the police

party, a bullet hit Constable Pawan Kumar, due to which he fell

down and later died. Those persons abandoned the Isuzu vehicle

on the spot and fled away with the Scorpio car. After necessary

formalities, when the Isuzu pickup was searched, a total of 600 kg

of poppy straw, an illegal contraband was recovered from it, which

was seized.

3.   After investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed

against the petitioner besides Rajesh @ Raju Fauzi, Lunaram,

Asharam, Balwant Dhakar @ Ballu, Sunil Dudi, Ramdev, Netaram

and Prakash.

4.   Mr. Vikas Balia, learned senior counsel for the petitioner

praying for bail to the petitioner urges that as per admitted

position found in the charge-sheet, filed after investigation into

the matter, the instant matter relates to an offence allegedly

                    (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM)
                                        (3 of 8)                     [CRLMB-9266/2023]


committed within the jurisdiction of police station Rayala. The

petitioner never entered into jurisdiction of Rayala police Station

area. Neither he confronted to the Rayala Police team at Liradiya

Kheda nor was even seen by the Rayala Police while allegedly

escorting the contraband.

5.      It is further argued that Scorpion car of the petitioner Sunil

Dudi was separated from the vehicle of the other accused at Kotdi

village itself and after leaving Kotdi, while turning towards other

side, he reached Devkheda village in Shahpura police station area

and from there he proceeded towards Jodhpur. The instant case

was registered in police station Rayala of Bhilwara district, where

the vehicle of Raju Fauzi was found abandoned. Therefore no

question could arise of Sunil Dudi escorting the vehicle of Raju

Fauzi up to Liradiya Kheda or sharing a common intention of

encountering      or   murdering          a       policeman        because   it   was

unimaginable that there could be a an encounter with the police

even in Rayala police station area. After investigation, police has

also found only the case of escorting against the petitioner and

filed the charge sheet for the offence punishable under Section

8/29 of the NDPS Act only.

6.      It is further argued that no poppy straw has been seized

from the possession of the present applicant. He is in custody

since 31.05.2022. Investigation is complete. Charge-sheet has

been filed. Final conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficient long

time. With the aforesaid submissions, it was prayed that the

present petition be allowed and petitioner may be enlarged on

bail.

                       (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM)
                                       (4 of 8)                    [CRLMB-9266/2023]


7.    On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor and Mr. J.S.

Choudhary, learned senior counsel appearing from the victim side

vehemently opposed the submissions advanced by the learned

counsel for the petitioner. It is urged that the petitioner is

arraigned on the basis of information of co-accused under Section

27 of the Evidence Act. It is also his contention that the petitioner

was a member of the team which had committed the murder of

the policemen in the area of Police Station Kotdi in Bhilwara

District prior to the present incident of Police Station Rayala.

8.    He would contend that petitioner, being part of common

object to commit murder of a person in Rayala is a factual issue

which cannot be addressed at this stage and ought to be

determined only after trial. While clubbing the events together

that took place in the four police station areas, they argued that

accused do not deserve any sympathy as the petitioner is a drug

peddler. Contraband of commercial quantity has been seized from

the co-accused; that release of accused will hamper the trial; that

the drugs recovered from the co-accused fall within the ambit of

commercial quantity and the bar as contained in Section 37 of the

NDPS Act is attracted.

9.    The respondent counsel would also point out that petitioner

has   been   charged      for    the     offences        punishable     by   severe

punishment;    that     the     very      harshness          of   the   penalty   is

demonstrative of the severity of the crime. Contrary to the

contentions of PP, it is argued by the counsel for the victim that

the allegation against the petitioner Sunil Dudi is also made out

for being involved in the common intention of murdering a

                      (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM)
                                         (5 of 8)                    [CRLMB-9266/2023]


policeman Pawan Kumar. The charges are yet to be framed in the

trial and there is every possibility of said charges being framed

against the petitioner. Therefore, considering the seriousness of

the crime, he opposed the bail application.

10.   In rebuttal, learned counsel for the petitioner has termed it

as mere conjecture and has argued that had it been so, it would

have been considered proved by the police in investigation itself.

It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that after their

investigation, police did not find proved that the petitioner was

complicit in the shared objective of murdering the policeman in

Rayala police station area.

11.   I have given my thoughtful consideration to the arguments

advanced by learned counsel for the parties and have perused the

record carefully.

12.   It is well settled that the jurisdiction of a Court to grant bail

for offences under NDPS Act, bail in cases of recovery of

commercial quantity is circumscribed by the provision of Section

37 of the Act. The bail can be granted only when there are prima

facie reasonable grounds in favour of petitioner to doubt case of

prosecution.

13.   The facts and evidence upon which, prosecution relies to

prosecute the petitioner, as derived from the charge sheet, can be

precisely summarized as follows:-

            fnukad 10-04-2021 dks MksMk pwjk Hkjus ds ckn jktw QkSth, lquhy
      MwMh ls laidZ djrk gSA jktw QkSth ds :V ls vufHkK gksus ls rFkk lquhy
      MwMh ds lkFk tks/kiqj pyus dh ckr iwoZ esa gh r; gksus ls os yksMsM gfFk;kj
      ysdj ,d lkFk e/;izns"k ls jokuk gksrs gS ------
            LdkWfiZ;ks la- vkj ts 14 ;w th 4301 dks usrjke pyk jgk Fkk] cxy
      dh lhV esa lquhy MwMh o chp dh lhV esa jke fuokl cSBk gqvk FkkA blds
      ihNs ,d ,e-,p- ikflax bZlwtw fidvi esa MksMk pwjk Hkjdj frjiky cka/kk

                        (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM)
                                           (6 of 8)                     [CRLMB-9266/2023]


      gqvk Fkk ftldks izdk"k dkaok pyk jgk Fkk o ikl esa jkenso cSBk gqvk FkkA
      rhljs okgu LdkWfiZ;ksa la- vkj ts 15 ;w ch 1010 dks ikcwjke xksjfl;k pyk
      jgk Fkk rFkk cxy okyh lhV ij ;"koar flag mQZ caVh cSBk gqvk FkkA pkSFks
      okgu bZlwtw fidvi vkj ts 06 th ch 3350 dks jes"k Hkkf.k;k pyk jgk Fkk
      o cxy dh lhV ij jktw QkSth cSBk Fkk ---------
                 mDr lHkh okgu dksVMh&uanjk; jksM ij eulk frjkgk ij
      vkdj :drs gS] ihNs&ihNs dksVMh iqfyl tkCrk dh izkbZosV fLo¶V dkj Hkh
      vkdj :drh gSA dksVMh iqfyl Fkkuk tkCrk budks idMus dk iz;kl djrk
      gS ogka iqfyl tkCrk rFkk bu okguks esa lokj O;fDr vkeus lkeus gksdj
      >Mi pkyw gks tkrh gSA ikcwjke xksjfl;k] dkWLVscy vksadkj ij xksyh pykrk
      gS ftldk ckn esa fu/ku gks tkrk gSA lqfuy MwMh xSax dh nksuks xkfM;k tks
      dkfQys esa vkxs Fkh] eulk dh rjQ tkus okys jkLrs ij Hkkx tkrh gS vkSj
      jktw QkSth xSax dh "ks'k nksuks xkfM;ka okil ihNs dh rjQ eksM dj Hkkxrs
      gSA bl ?kVuk dze ds laca/k esa iqfyl Fkkuk dksVMh ij ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- la-
      72@2021 ntZ gksrh gS------
                 ogka ls lqfuy MwMh vius nksuks okguks dks ysdj "kkgiqjk Fkkuk {ks= esa
      nso[ksMk ls iksafMªd tkus okys ekxZ ij jktw [kkjksy निवासी दे वखेड़ा uked
      O;fDr ds ckMs esa ,e- ,p- ikflax bZlwtw xkMh ls MksMk pwjk [kkyh dj Nqik
      nsrs gSA ogka ij jkenso dks निगरानी के लिए jksd fn;k tkrk gSA bZlwtw xkMh ls
      izdk"k dkoka dks tks/kiqj ds fy;s jokuk dj nsrk gSA lqfuy rFkk jkefuokl
      viuh LdkWfiZ;ks dkj la- vkj ts 14 ;w th 4301 ls og Hkh tks/kiqj jokuk gks
      tkrk gSA "kkgiqjk Fkkuk {ks= esa tCr fd;s x;s mDr MksMk pwjk ds laca/k esa
      iqfyl Fkkuk "kkgiqjk esa ,QvkbZvkj la- 133@2021 ntZ gksrh gS------
                 DosLVh dh ikyuk esa ukdkcafn;k gksus ls jkf= yxHkx nks cts ljsjh
      QkVd ls dqafM;k xkao tkus okyh jksM ij jktw QkSth xSax ds nksuks okgu]
      jk;yk iqfyl Fkkuk ds okgu ls dzkWl djrs gSA jk;yk iqfyl tkCrk }kjk
      mudk ihNk fd;k tkrk gSA fyjfM;k [ksMk ds ikl jktw QkSth xSax ds
      lnL;ks rFkk jk;yk iqfyl tkCrk esa >Mi o eqBHksM gksrh gSA ogka ij
      dkWLVscy iou dqekj ds xksyh yxrh gS ckn esa mldk fu/ku gks tkrk gS
      rFkk jktw QkSth xSax ds lnL; vius okgu ysdj ?kVukLFky ls Hkkx tkrs
      gSA bl ?kVuk ds laca/k esa jk;yk iqfyl Fkkuk esa ,QvkbZvkj la- 55@2021
      ntZ gksrh gSA orZeku izkFkZuk i= dk ekeyk blh ,QvkbZvkj ls lacaf/kr gS
      ----------

jk;yk Fkkuk {ks= ls fudyus ds i"pkr jktw QkSth xSax ds lnL; jktlaen ftys ds Hkhe iqfyl Fkkuk {ks= esa izos"k djrs gS rFkk /keZrykbZ rkykc ds ,uhdV dh iky ds ihNs MksMk pwjk ls Hkjs LdkWfiZ;ks la- vkj ts 15 ;w ch 1010 dks NksMdj pkSFks okgu ls taxy ds jkLrs Hkkx tkrs gSA bl cjkenxh ds lanHkZ esa iqfyl Fkkuk Hkhe {ks= esa ,d vU; ,QvkbZvkj la- 194@2021 ntZ gksrh gSA

14. In present incident of Police Station Rayala, after investigation in relation to that, after finding the case proved against various accused, charge sheet was presented by police, proposing prosecution as described below:- (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM)

                                      (7 of 8)                    [CRLMB-9266/2023]


                                      Charge Sheeted for the offences U/
   S.No.   Name of Accused
                                                       s

Sec.147,148,149,332,353,307,411, 467,468,471, 474,302/34 & 120B of the IPC Rajesh @ Raju 1 Sec. 3&4 of PDPP Act Fauzi Sec. 8/15 NDPS Act Sec. 3/25 read with Sec.

35,25(6),28&5/27 of Arms Act Sec. 225,212,201,202,302 IPC 2 Lunaram Sec. 27A NDPS Act 3 Asharam Sec. 8/29 NDPS Act Balwant Dhakar @ 4 Sec. 8/29 NDPS Act Ballu 5 Sunil Dudi Sec. 8/29 NDPS Act 6 Ramdev Sec. 8/29 NDPS Act 7 Netaram Sec. 8/29 NDPS Act 8 Prakash Sec. 8/29 NDPS Act Investigation kept pending U/s 173(8) of the Cr.P.C:-

1. Bhutaram Bishnoi
2. Ramniwas
3. Vikram @ Vikki
4. Anil Janwani
15. After considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties, on going through the content of charge-

sheet it is admitted case of the prosecution that the petitioner was traveling in Scorpio No.RJ-14-UG-4301 and that no contraband were loaded in it; that petitioner did not entered into Police Station Rayala area to escort the vehicle of the co-accused Raju Fauzi; that petitioner was not present at the time of the police encounter at Liradiya Kheda; that petitioner left Kotdi for another destination and was not in the company of Raju Fauzi and others at Liradiya Kheda; that 600 Kg. of poppy straw has not been seized from possession of the petitioner and it has been seized from an abandoned vehicle of co-accused. Admittedly, no crime of escorting by petitioner was occurred in the area of Police Station Rayala District Bhilawara.

(Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM)

(8 of 8) [CRLMB-9266/2023]

16. On the basis of above facts, this court feels that the petitioner has available to him, substantial grounds so as to question the prosecution case. Thus, having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the fact that the rigor of Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. act is duly satisfied so as to entitle the petitioner's release on bail.

17. Thus, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court finds it expedient to allow the present bail application.

18. Accordingly, the second bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioners Sunil Dudi S/o Sh. Opa Ram Vishnoi arrested in connection with the F.I.R. No.55/2021 of Police Station Rayala, District Bhilwara shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond and two surety bonds of sufficient amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. This order is subject to the condition that accused, within 7 days of his release and sureties, on the day of furnishing bail, will also furnish details of their all bank accounts, with bank and branch name, in shape of an affidavit, and submit legible copy of their Aadhar cards as well as front page of Bank pass book, for smooth recovery of penalty amount, if there arise a need for recovery of penalty under Section 446 Cr.P.C in future.

(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J 60-Payal/-

(Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:29:40 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)