Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ramchandra Walke vs Phulsingh Birsingh Boath (D) By Lr. on 14 November, 2014

Bench: Madan B. Lokur, R. Banumathi

                                                     1

                                   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10260 OF 2014
                         (arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 13903 of 2009)

         RAMCHANDRA WALKE                                                Appellant(s)

                                               VERSUS

         PHULSINGH BIRSINGH BOATH (D)                                    Respondent(s)
         BY LR.& ANR
                               O R D                     E    R

                            Leave granted.

         2.                 We   have   perused   the        judgment   of     the    High

         Court of Bombay in Prabhudas Damodar Kotecha & Anr.

         Vs.                Manharbala    Jeram   Damodar         &   Ors.,    2007    (5)

         Bom.C.R. 1, which has been affirmed by this Court in

         Prabhudas Damodar Kotecha & Ors. Vs.                                 Manharbala

         Jeram Damodar & Anr., 2013 (10) SCALE 242.

         3.                 Learned counsel for the parties agree that in

         view of the above decisions, the suit being L.E.S.

         (Stamp) No. 1027 of 1999 which was filed by the

         appellant in the Court of Small Causes, Mumbai may

         be revived. We order accordingly.

         4.
Signature Not Verified      In view of the above, nothing further remains
Digitally signed by
Rajesh Dham
Date: 2014.11.17

         to be decided in the appeal. Appeal stands disposed
16:53:33 IST
Reason:




         of accordingly.                 No costs.
                             2

5.     Since the above suit is quite old, the Court

of Small Causes, Mumbai may dispose of the same as

expeditiously as possible.



                       ........................J.
                       (MADAN B. LOKUR)



NEW DELHI;             ........................J.
NOVEMBER 14, 2014      (R. BANUMATHI)
                                   3
ITEM NO.202                 COURT NO.10                  SECTION IX

                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)     No(s).    13903/2009

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/02/2009
in CA No. 4547/2008 in FA No. 2256/2007 passed by the High Court
Of Bombay)

RAMCHANDRA WALKE                                        Petitioner(s)

                                  VERSUS

PHULSINGH BIRSINGH BOATH (D) BY LR.& ANR                Respondent(s)

(with I.A. No. 1 – appln. For directions and with interim relief
and office report)

[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL]

Date : 14/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
          HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Petitioner(s)      Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv.
                       Ms. Shubhangi Tuli, Adv.
                       Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv.

For Respondent(s)      Mr. Javed Ahmad, Adv.
                       Mr. Zeshan Khan, Adv.
                       Mr. Ram Swarup Sharma,Adv.


           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                              O R D E R

Leave granted.

Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.



    (RAJESH DHAM)                       (JASWINDER KAUR)
    COURT MASTER                          COURT MASTER

(signed order is placed on the file)