Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Priyanka And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 19 November, 2015

Author: M.M.S. Bedi

Bench: M.M.S. Bedi

                CRM-M-30407-2015
                                                                                                1


                246
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                                          CHANDIGARH
                                                         CRM-M-30407-2015
                                                Date of decision : 19.11.2015

                Priyanka and another
                                                                                ..... Petitioners

                                                   VERSUS

                State of Haryana and others                                ..... Respondents

                CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

                Present:         Mr. Sachin Gupta (Ladwa), Advocate
                                 for the petitioners.

                                 Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana.

                                 Mr. Sunny Deep Joneja, Advocate
                                 for respondents No.5 to 8.
                                                       *****
                M.M.S. BEDI, J.(Oral)

This is a petition for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. Reply by way of affidavit on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, filed by the State counsel, is taken on record.

Counsel for the private respondents has put in appearance and informs that there is no threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the marriage of the petitioners is void, the petitioners being amongst the members of a family falling under prohibited degrees. Private respondents seek to reserve their right to challenge the marriage on the basis of abovesaid plea. RAMANDEEP SINGH 2015.11.20 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-30407-2015 2 In the abovesaid circumstances, interim order dated 09.09.2015, is hereby made absolute. However, the private respondents will be entitled to seek any relief challenging the relationship of the petitioners, in accordance with law.





                                                               (M.M.S. BEDI)
                November 19, 2015                                  JUDGE
                Ramandeep Singh




RAMANDEEP SINGH
2015.11.20 17:39
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document