Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Noida vs Cmc Ltd on 20 August, 2018

 IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE
                   TRIBUNAL
                 REGIONAL BENCH : ALLAHABAD
                         COURT No. I

                 APPEAL No.ST/53099/2015-CU[DB]

(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No.NOI/SVTAX/000/APPL-I/69/2015-16
dated 06/05/2015 passed by Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise,
Meerut)


Commissioner, Service Tax, Noida                           Appellant
Vs.
M/s CMC Ltd.                                             Respondent

Appearance:

Shri Gyanendra Kumar Tripathi, Asstt. Commer. (A.R.) for Appellant None for Respondent CORAM:
Hon'ble Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) Hon'ble Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Date of Hearing : 20/08/2018 Date of Decision : 20/08/2018 FINAL ORDER NO.71987/2018 Per: Archana Wadhwa Revenue is in appeal against the order dated 06.05.2015 of Commissioner (Appeals-I), Meerut.

2. We are informed about the Instructions dated 11.07.2018 issued by the C.B.E. & C. in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 fixing monetary limits below which appeal shall not be filed in the Tribunal. The monetary limit has been enhanced to Rs. 20 lakhs through the said Instructions. Further, the said 2 APPEAL No.ST/53099/2015-CU[DB] instructions clarified that the said instructions will apply to all pending cases.

3. We also find that the Hon'ble High Courts of Madras, Karnataka and Gujarat have held that the litigation policy containing monetary limit for filing appeals will apply to pending appeals also. [2015 (40) S.T.R. 656 (Mad.); 2014 (306) E.L.T. 153 (Guj.); 2011 (268) E.L.T. 344 (Kar.) = 2012 (26) S.T.R. 79 (Kar.)].

4. It is further informed by the ld. AR that vide subsequent instructions issued vide F. No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 04/04/2018, the earlier exclusion category not covered by the litigation policy has also now been included, by removing Sub-clause 'C' of earlier instructions.

5. Considering the above instruction, we dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue under litigation policy for the respondent.



                     (Pronounced & Dictated in Court)




            Sd/-                                         Sd/-
(Anil G. Shakkarwar)                            (Archana Wadhwa)
Member (Technical)                               Member (Judicial)
Nihal