Central Information Commission
Shri.Ravi Jindal vs Union Public Service Commission on 28 February, 2011
ds U nz h ; l wp uk vk;ks x
Central Information Commission
Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office
iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus
ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi - 110067
(Ph: 01126160943)
*****
No.CIC/SM/C/2011/000265
Dated: 28 February 2011
Name of the Complainant : Shri Ravi Jindal
112, Bharpur Garden,
Opp. Govt. Ayurvedic College,
Patiala - 147 001.
Name of the Public Authority : The Appellate Authority
Union Public Service Commission,
(Sangh Lok Seva Ayog),
Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road,
New Delhi.
ORDER
Shri Ravi Jindal of Patiala has complained to the Central Information Commission that he received no reply/information from the Branch Manager/Central Public Information Officer although he had filed his RTI application on 25 November 2010. A copy each of the RTIapplication and the complaint are enclosed for ready reference.
2. It is noted that the Complainant did not have an opportunity to go to the Appellate Authority and has directly approached the Commission with his complaint. In exercise of powers vested under Section 18(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, we direct the Appellate Authority to enquire into the allegations made by the Complainant and after giving him an opportunity of hearing, to pass an appropriate order with a view to ensuring that the desired information is provided to the Complainant without any further loss of time.
3. We also direct the Appellate Authority to obtain the explanation of the Branch Manager/CPIO in writing for not providing the information in time and to forward the same to us along with his comments before 28 March 2011. We will decide on the imposition of penalty on the Branch Manager/CPIO in terms of Section 20(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act thereafter.
4. In case the Complainant is not satisfied with the orders of the Appellate Authority, he is free to approach this Commission again in second appeal.
5. The Commission ordered accordingly.
(Satyananda Mishra) Chief Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this Commission.
(Vijay Bhalla) Deputy Registrar