Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Hasmukh @ Lalo Kadvaji Damor vs State Of Gujarat on 24 November, 2017

Author: G.R.Udhwani

Bench: G.R.Udhwani

                     R/CR.MA/27566/2017                                              ORDER




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 27566 of 2017

         ==========================================================
                         HASMUKH @ LALO KADVAJI DAMOR....Applicant(s)
                                          Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR. R.D.KINARIWALA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR JK SHAH ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
         No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI

                                          Date : 24/11/2017


                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the  respondent­State.

2. This   application   is   filed   seeking   bail   under   Section   439   of   the  Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in respect of the offences punishable  under  Sections  365,  342,   376D,  506(2)  and  114  of   the  Indian   Penal  Code ( for short 'the IPC') and Section 135 of the G.P. Act   for which  FIR came to be registered at C.R. No.I­ 89 of 2017  with Bhiloda  Police  Station. 

3. Having considered the nature of accusation against the petitioner  and in absence of antecedent against the petitioner; as also in absence  Page 1 of 3 HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Sat Nov 25 03:14:29 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/27566/2017 ORDER of apprehension against him tampering with the evidence or threatening  the   witnesses   of   fleeing   from   justice,   the   case   for   admitting   the  petitioner to bail is made out. 

4. Hence, this application is allowed and applicant is ordered to be  released on bail in connection with CR No. I­ 89 of 2017 registered with  Bhiloda Police Station on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/­ (Rupees Ten  Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of  the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

(c)   surrender   his   passport,   if   any,   to   the   lower   court   within   a  week;

(d) not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the  Sessions Judge concerned;

(e) mark   presence   in     the   concerned   police   station   once   in   a  calendar month.

(f)  furnish the present address of residence along with the proof  to   the   Investigating   Officer   concerned  and  also   to  the  trial  court at the time of execution of the bond and shall indicate  change of residential address if any to the trial court. 

5. The competent authority will release the applicants only if he is  not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.

5.1 If   breach   of   any   of   the   above   conditions   is   committed,   the  Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the  Page 2 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Sat Nov 25 03:14:29 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/27566/2017 ORDER matter. 

5.2 Bail   bond   to   be   executed   before   the   lower   court   having  jurisdiction to try the case. 

5.3 It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or  relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. 

5.4 At   the   trial,   the   trial   court   shall   not   be   influenced   by   the  observations   of   preliminary   nature,   qua   the   evidence   at   this   stage,  made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

6.  Rule   made   absolute   to   the   aforesaid   extent.   Direct   service   is  permitted. 

(G.R.UDHWANI, J.) niru* Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Sat Nov 25 03:14:29 IST 2017