Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Dr. Mrs Aruna Rande vs Shri Mukund Bapuraoji Shende & Ors. on 13 October, 2011

  
 
 
 
 
 
 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
  
 
 
 







 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

STATE CONSUMER
    DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,  MAHARASHTRA
    
   
    
     
     

CIRCUIT BENCH
    AT   NAGPUR
    
   
    
     
     

5 TH FLOOR,
    ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
    
   
    
     
     

CIVIL LINES,
    NAGPUR-440 001
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

First Appeal
      No. A/01/683
      
     
      
       
       

(Arisen out of Order Dated
      12/04/2001 in Case No. CC/97/179 of District Forum, Yavatmal) 
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

Dr. Mrs Aruna Rande 
        
       
        
         
         

  Ranade
          Hospital, Civil
        Line Yavatmal 
        
       
      
       

 
      
       
       

...........Appellant(s)
      
     
      
       
       

  
       

Versus 
       

  
      
     
      
       
       
         
         
         

1.

Shri Mukund Bapuraoji Shende Jaihind Chowk, Yavatmal  

2. Ku. Anjali Mukund Shende Jaihind Chowk, Yavalmal Yavatmal Maharashtra  

3. The United India Insurance Co.

Yavatmal Branch, Through its Branch Manager Yavatmal Maharashtra ...........Respondent(s)   BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole Presiding Member   Hon'ble Smt.Jayshree Yengal Member   Hon'ble Mr N. Arumugam Member   PRESENT:
None ......for the Appellant   None for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Adv.Mr B Lahiri for Respondent No.3 ......for the Respondent ORDER Per Mr S M Shembole, Honble Presiding Member            Appellant Dr. Mrs. Aruna Ranade as well as her counsel Mr Uday Dastane are absent. Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and their counsel are also absent. Respondent No.3 as well as his counsel Mr B Lahiri are also absent. However, Proxy Adv.Mr Dhiman Chatterjee for Adv. Mr B Lahiri appeared and filed authority letter issued by Adv. Mr Lahiri.  
The record reflects that the appellant as well as her counsel are absent since after granting the interim stay.  Thereafter interim stay was also vacated and on 07.04.2011, the matter was adjourned till today. Even though, the appellant as well as her counsel remained absent. 
Therefore, we have no other alternative except to dismiss the appeal in default. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in default.
         
No order as to cost.
         
Copy of this order be supplied to the parties.
         
Pronounced on 13.10.2011.
   
[ HON'BLE S.M. SHEMBOLE] PRESIDING MEMBER   [ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL] MEMBER   [ HON'BLE N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER sj