Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Mohinder Kaur (Through Spa) vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 3 April, 2017

Author: Arun Palli

Bench: Arun Palli

RFA No.1457 of 2017

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                    CHANDIGARH

                                         CM-4028-CI-2017 in/and
                                         RFA No.1457 of 2017 (O&M)
                                         Date of Decision:03.04.2017

Mahinder Kaur (through SPA) Uttam Singh.

                                                           .....appellant

                  Versus

State of Haryana and another                               .....respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:    Mr. Navmohit Singh,Advocate for the applicant-appellant.
                             ***

ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL):

CM No-4028-CI of 2017 Allowed as prayed for.

CM No.3719-CI of 2017 For the reasons set out in the application, the delay of 350 days that has occurred in re-filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.

CM disposed of.

CM No.3720-CI of 2017 This is an application for condonation of delay of 1day in filing the accompanying appeal.

Notice in the application.

On the asking of the Court, Mr.Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana, present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents.

For the reasons set out in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. Consequently, the delay of 1 day in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 09-04-2017 13:02:54 ::: RFA No.1457 of 2017 -2- CM No.3721-CI of 2017 Allowed as prayed for.

RFA-1457-2017 Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgement dated 02.03.2017, rendered in RFA No.6232 of 2015 (Diljit Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana through Secretary Urban Estate, Chandigarh and others) and other connected matters, vide which the compensation awarded to the claimants- landowners was enhanced by this Court. Thus, it is submitted that the present appeal too be disposed of in terms of the said decision.

Ordered accordingly.



                                                        (ARUN PALLI)
03.04. 2017                                                JUDGE
raman/manoj bhutani


              Whether speaking/reasoned               Yes/No
              Whether reportable                      Yes/No




                                 2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 09-04-2017 13:02:55 :::