Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Honey Mangal Totala vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 December, 2020

Author: V. K. Jadhav

Bench: V. K. Jadhav

                                    1              23-BA-1375-2020.odt

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                   23 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1375 OF 2020

             1. GANESHKUMAR S/O KAILASCHANDRA KEWAT
                  2. UMESHKUMAR S/O JAGDISH GAUR
                 3. SHRIKANT S/O DEVKISANJIT MEENA
                  4. MANSINGH S/O RAMDAYAL GUJAR
                                VERSUS
                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

                                   WITH
                     BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1404 OF 2020

                      HONEY S/O MANGAL TOTALA
                                  VERSUS
                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                     .....
           Advocate for Applicants in BA/1375/2020 : Mr. Gore
                             Ravindra Vitthal
          Advocate for Applicant in BA/1404/2020 : Mr. R. R. Kazi
               APP for Respondent-State : Mr. A. A. Jagatkar
                                     .....

                                   CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.
                                   DATED : 21ST DECEMBER, 2020

     PER COURT :-

     1.       I have heard learned counsel for the applicants in both

     the applications. Learned counsel for the applicants, on

     instructions, seek leave to withdraw Bail Application No.

     1404 of 2020 filed by HONEY S/O MANGAL TOTALA, so

     also the application of applicant no. 1 GANESHKUMAR S/O


     vre/-




::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2020                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/02/2021 15:19:20 :::
                                    2              23-BA-1375-2020.odt

     KAILASCHANDRA KEWAT in Bail Application No. 1375 of

     2020 with liberty to the applicants to file an application for

     regular bail before the courts below after filing of the charge

     sheet.



     2.       Leave granted. Bail Application No. 1404 of 2020, so

     also the application of applicant no.1 GANESHKUMAR S/O

     KAILASCHANDRA KEWAT in Bail Application No. 1375 of

     2020 is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to the

     applicants to file an application for regular bail before the

     courts below after filing of the charge sheet.



     3.       So far as the amount deposited before this Court is

     concerned, the same shall be transferred to the trial court

     and upon filing an application for regular bail as per the

     liberty granted by this Court, the courts below may consider

     this aspect while considering the applications for regular

     bail.




     vre/-




::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2020                 ::: Downloaded on - 10/02/2021 15:19:20 :::
                                    3              23-BA-1375-2020.odt

     4.      Applicant Nos. 2 to 4 in Bail Application No. 1375 of

     2020 are seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No.

     586 of 2020 registered with Taluka Jalna Police Station,

     District Jalna for the offence punishable under Sections 419

     and 420 of IPC and under Sections 66c and 66d of the

     Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Their

     application with similar prayer bearing Criminal Misc.

     Petition (Bail) No. 1567 of 2020 came to be rejected by the

     Additional Sessions Judge-3, Jalna vide order dated

     10.11.2020.



     5.      Learned counsel for the applicants submits that neither

     the names of applicant nos. 2 to 4 are mentioned in the FIR

     nor any incriminating material has been revealed during

     investigation against them. Learned counsel submits that the

     applicants are having a fixed place of residence and the

     documents i.e. the Aadhar Cards of all the three applicants

     are produced on record. Learned counsel submits that there

     in no criminal history and they have been arrested in

     connection with the present crime merely on suspicion.


     vre/-




::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2020                 ::: Downloaded on - 10/02/2021 15:19:20 :::
                                   4              23-BA-1375-2020.odt

     6.      Learned APP has strongly resisted the application of

     applicant nos. 2, 3 and 4 in Bail Application No. 1375 of

     2020 on the ground that though their names are not

     mentioned in the FIR, however, as per the statements of

     witnesses, co-accused Ganeshkumar and Honey Mangal

     Totala have prepared a fake website and on the basis of the

     same, lured the investors and collected huge amount from

     them. So far as the present applicant nos. 2, 3 and 4 are

     concerned, it has been revealed during investigation that

     they have tried to convince the prospective investors to

     deposit money in the trading company known as Money

     Growth Solution Trading Company. The investigation is still

     in progress. The applicant nos. 2, 3 and 4 may not be

     released on bail.



     7.      On going through the allegations made in the

     complaint and on perusal of the investigation papers it

     appears that even though the crime came to be registered in

     the month of October 2020 and the applicants came to be

     arrested in connection with the present crime since

     28.10.2020, no incriminating material seems to have been

     vre/-




::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2020                ::: Downloaded on - 10/02/2021 15:19:20 :::
                                       5             23-BA-1375-2020.odt

     collected against applicant nos. 2, 3 and 4. Not a single

     witness has stated anything against applicant nos. 2, 3 and 4

     by referring their individual acts. The applicants are having a

     fixed place of residence the learned counsel for the

     applicants submits that the applicants are ready to give local

     surety. The applicants have also deposited the entire amount

     as per the allegations made in the FIR. It further appears

     from the submissions of learned APP that no other investor

     has come forward so far. In view of the same, I proceed to

     pass the following order:

                                  ORDER

I. The application is hereby partly allowed. II. The applicant nos. 2. UMESHKUMAR S/O JAGDISH GAUR, 3. SHRIKANT S/O DEVKISANJIT MEENA and 4. MANSINGH S/O RAMDAYAL GUJAR in Bail Application No. 1375 of 2020 be released on bail in connection with Crime No. 586 of 2020 registered with Taluka Jalna Police Station, District Jalna for the offence punishable under Sections 419 and 420 of IPC and under Sections 66c and 66d of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, on vre/-

::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 10/02/2021 15:19:20 :::

6 23-BA-1375-2020.odt furnishing P.B. of Rs.50,000/- each with one solvent surety each of the like amount on the following conditions :-

a] The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
b] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station once in a week i.e. on every Sunday between 02.00 p.m. to 05.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet.

c] The applicants, as agreed, shall submit the local surety to the extent as directed above.

III. The amount of Rs. 2,32,000/- deposited before this Court shall be transferred to the trial court and the trial court shall pass the appropriate orders in respect of the amount so transferred at the time of conclusion of the trial. IV. Both the Bail Applications are accordingly disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J. ) vre/-

::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 10/02/2021 15:19:20 :::