Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

C. Surendran vs T. Ravindran on 29 March, 1995

Equivalent citations: [1996]217ITR368(MAD)

JUDGMENT
 

  Shivappa, J.  
 

1. The petitioner is seeking for quashing the proceedings initiated for offences under ss. 120B, 420 r/w s. 511, IPC, 1860, and under ss. 276C(1), 277 and 278B of the IT Act, 1961. The manner in which the offences have been committed are all matters of evidence. The petitioner has got a stage to urge all his contentions before the trial Court at the appropriate stage. I see no ground to quash the proceedings. Counsel for the petitioner is absent though it is 12.10 p. m. Petitions, therefore, dismissed.

2. Consequently, Criminal Misc. Petitions Nos. 5241 and 5242 of 1994 are also dismissed.