Karnataka High Court
M/S Manipal Apparels Pvt Ltd vs State Of Karnataka By Its Secretary on 18 September, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
Bench: N.K.Patil
IN TIE I~fiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE '9ar'.P.N(}. F3064 OF 21107
-3- 1
IN THE HIGH count!' or KARNA TAKA A r BANGALORE
mcmn mm Tim mm mm or .
ms Ho:v'e:.5 MR. JUSTKJE M4954 rig, '
W.P.NO. 17064 OFV20O§".__(éM¥ST"gfli
BETWEEN
1 ms MAMPAL APPARELS PVT LTD " - ~ . .
wrm omca AND FAGTQRY AT'i'A!3&'1,Ti1MKUR RCIAD;
YESHVVANTHPUR,BAi\!GA1.0RE--22__. ' --«
REPBY as amacroa sm,s2_A6H:av;A sngmeaa
AGED 55 YEAR,RtAT.NO.16?,PR3'\KRUTH«%.10T}~:.
'E'MAlN,1ST at sex JA"fAMAGAR.= . V " "
BANGALORE-$1. _ V ' "
4' _ m ...PETlTiONER
(By an: <3 LAKSi~!r§fi£¥2.E.?'.:fi RAG Azjvéicaifé) '
AND ;
1 STATE'€}FVVE{Af2xt§A1.;A!;§A ESMTS SECRETARY
To GOVERNMEBHZDEPARTMENT or REVENUE,
' ' §VH3HA£~1A SOL£QHA,BAHGALORE~1.
' V' -2; - 3fH£€"RE{3$QNAL Cc§§Mssao:~4ER
. * .. FQR REG4V€STRATiON OF STAMPS
" T " 'AT BANGALQRE,31NU FLOOR,
'_ B78 TERMSNML COMF'LEX,KH ROAD,
*BANGR£ ,QRE~2?.,
V. 3 "'THE2 l".J.tSTi§iCT REGISTRAR
_ DETE'NTi0N D£V%SlON FOR UNDERVALUATION,
' x T OF 'STAMPS,NO.12I3€3,2N{) FLOOR,
' .35? MANFAJAJINAGAR ENDUSTRIAL TOWN.
4 T ' - _E2AJAJiNA<3AR.BAMGALORE~44.
4"; THE sus REGISTRAR
RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE.
RES!'-'-'0biDENTS
(SRL B. VEERAPPA ASA FOR RESPQNDENTS)
KN TI~iI£ HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE WRNO. U064 01'? 200?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. WPRO. 1?fl64 OF 200'!
-3.
THIS WP. IS FILED UMBER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER
QT. '£01200? PASSED BY THE R2 AS PER ANNEXURE A AND THE-QRDER
03". 15122006 PASSED BY THE R3 DISTRICT REGISTRAR "-{IDE
DOCUMENT AS PER ANNEXURE B DECLARE THAT THE PEETITI<j3I'I_E_f?.VI-Ifisfi
NOT UNDERVALUED THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. _
"rs-us wxv. comm. on ma PRELIMINARY HEARII-zé' IN féf: (§I§f3II_?f
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
.-onpsa:
The petitioner-Mls. aaLanappaIpE EEAppa:e3éEEPrpatefppp,
Limited, represented by fire
correcmess of flue I 0.7.2007
passed 17)' Ihsw 2"°'p wse No.
Anne-xure-A and the
order by the 3"' respondent -
Destrjm RIegas:;a§ ,Ipi5IIsas§é No.MVD:R:330:1994-95 vide vide Annexure -8, has I petition. Further, petitioner has sought toA 'decI;5r'«§. the petitioner has not undewalued the I I' 'T I 4." ' prom I questipn.
It is not in dispute that, petitioner being aggrieved I the order passed I: the 3"' respondent datad IN 'I'HI€-1 HIGH COEIRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.I-30. 17064 CE' 260'?
IN THE HIGH COEIRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. WPNO. 17064 OF 200?
-5.
(3) The writ petition filed by pefitioneif'i$_":€::i.V:_' allowed in part. 'A V
(ii) The impugned Passed by the second it STP: Appeal: CR:
hereby Set aside' Q
(iii) Matter steeple i to the seconcl of the matte; te;::oil,.Vte§ke appropriate deeieiop with law, after effordii1g.. to the petitioner, " _ \é)ith"'reference to Annexuree-M and team this Court (Annexures--..l and ~ ofuthé: same by passing a speaking order it opportunity to the floner, as expeditiously il<«..opef_oi'eA5thle Appellate Authority) and dispose tiaieiisigning valid reasons, after affording r/I)!' L .
IN T313. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.NO. F3064 ($3 266?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. WPNO. F7064 OF 2007 -6- as possible, at any rate within a period of months from the date of receipt of h' of this order. % V 'V tsn* IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANEAIQRE WPNO. W664 OF 201!