Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Parijat Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd vs Kesh Bihari Choudhury on 23 February, 2010

Author: Patherya

Bench: Patherya

                       GA No. 374 of 2010
                       CS No. 356 of 2009
                  IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
              Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction


   PARIJAT VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.
       Versus
   KESH BIHARI CHOUDHURY


   For Petitioner : Mr.Arindam Sinha with Mr.Sabyasachi Sen


   BEFORE:
   The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA
   Date : 23rd February, 2010.




                               The Court : None appears on behalf of the

respondent inspite of service. Affidavit of service filed be kept

on record.

Report filed by the Receiver be kept on record. The only reason for non-implementation of the order dated 12th February, 2010 is refusal to issue gatepass as there was no specific direction upon P.M.P. Mines to do so in whose premises the rock breaker is lying. As the asset in question is lying in the area of P.M.P. Mines let a gatepass be issued by P.M.P. Mines to enable the Receiver to implement the order dated 12th February, 2010. In case faced with obstruction at the time of removal of the asset in question the Receiver will be at liberty to seek police assistance and the local police authority will ensure all assistance to the Receiver.

2

Matter to appear in the list three weeks hence.

Interim order granted is extended for five weeks.

The petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the non-appearing respondent.

Receiver, local police authority, PMP Mines and all parties to act on a photostat signed copy of this order on the usual undertakings.

(PATHERYA, J.) pa