Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 15]

Bombay High Court

M/S. K.K. Enterprises Thr. Pro. Kundan ... vs Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal ... on 4 January, 2023

Author: Sandeep V. Marne

Bench: S.V.Gangapurwala, Sandeep V. Marne

                                                                    37.12265.22-wp.docx


         Digitally               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         signed by
         BASAVRAJ                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BASAVRAJ GURAPPA
GURAPPA PATIL
PATIL    Date:
         2023.01.04                INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.374 OF 2023
         19:35:46
         +0530                                       IN
                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 12265 OF 2022

                                                      WITH

                                   INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.371 OF 2023
                                                     IN
                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 12274 OF 2022

                      M/s. K.K. Enterprises & Anr.                    .....Applicants /
                                                                         Petitioners

                             Vs.

                      Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal
                      Corporation & Ors.
                                                                      ..... Respondents

                      Mr. Pralhad Paranjape a/w. Mr. Manish Kelkar for the Applicants
                      Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo for Respondent Nos.1 and 2


                                             CORAM:      S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ &
                                                         SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                             DATED :     JANUARY 4, 2023

                      P.C.

                      1      Mentioned. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.


                      2      It is submitted that the work order has been issued in these

matters in favor of Respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No.12265 of 2022 and in favour of Respondent No.10 in Writ Petition No.12274 of 2022. The same is issued after filing of these Writ Petitions. Basavraj 1/2

37.12265.22-wp.docx 3 The learned Counsel for the Applicants seeks leave to amend the petitions in tune with the schedule of amendment annexed with the Applications.

4 We have heard the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. 5 The Writ Petitions are at nascent stage. Even otherwise, the non Applicants will have every opportunity to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment. 6 For the reasons recorded in the Applications, the Applications, to the extent of amendment, are allowed.

7 The Interim Applications stand disposed of. 8 The Petitioners shall carry out the amendment within seven days. Reverification is dispensed with.

9 Upon amendment being carried out, issue notice to the Respondents in the Writ Petitions, returnable on 1 st February 2023. Hamdast allowed.

10 Mr.Rohit Sakhdeo, the learned Counsel waives service for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the Writ Petitions. ( SANDEEP V. MARNE , J) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Basavraj 2/2