Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Official Liquidator vs Respondent(S) on 1 July, 2005

Author: K.A.Puj

Bench: K.A.Puj

                                            1

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                   OFFICIAL LIQUDATOR REPORT No. 9 of 2004

         =======================================================
                   OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR - Petitioner(s)
                                  Versus
                            . - Respondent(s)
         =======================================================
         Appearance :
         OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR for Petitioner No(s).: 1.
         None for Respondent No(s).: 1.
         =======================================================

                      CORAM :HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ

                               Date : 01/07/2005

                                    ORAL ORDER

1. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 13.05.2005, the O.L. has furnished list of candidates received from Employment Exchange along with covering letter. The O.L. has submitted that he has issued appointment order to Shri Sunil Kasim for the post of Steno-cum-Computer Operator with consolidated salary of Rs. 5,000/- for 31.07.2005. He has further submitted that the said period of appointment may be extended upto 31.12.2005.

HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Jun 22 23:51:40 IST 2017 2

2. Considering the details furnished by O.L., the Court grants sanction and permits the O.L. for issuing appointment order of Shri Sunil Kasim for the post of Steno-cum-Computer Operator with consolidated salary of Rs. 5,000/- upto the period of 31.12.2005.

3. With regard to appointment of Watchman-cum-Peon, the O.L. has submitted that he wrote a letter to one Mr. Ashok Chauhan. However, he has not shown any response. The O.L. requires to appoint another person as Watchman-cum-Peon and he will file further report before the Court.

4. This report is adjourned syne die. O.L. is permitted to move appropriate application seeking necessary order.

              Savariya                                        [K.A. PUJ, J.]




HC-NIC                                 Page 2 of 2      Created On Thu Jun 22 23:51:40 IST 2017