Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 6]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Brahma Nand Sharma(D) Thr. Lr. Sumitra ... vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 4 February, 2021

Bench: Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Vineet Saran

                                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                       CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7101 OF 2010


      BRAHMA NAND SHARMA(D) THR. LR. SUMITRA DEVI                      … Appellant(s)

                                                    VERSUS

      THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR.                             … Respondent(s)



                                                 O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the wife of the deceased employee is already aged about 90 years and receiving family pension, we decline to interfere with the said facility provided to her. Let her continue to receive the family pension during her lifetime.

With these observations, the appeal stands disposed of.

………………………………………………………………………,J. (Mohan M. Shantanagoudar) ……………………………………………………………………,J. (Vineet Saran) New Delhi;

February 04, 2021.


Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
GULSHAN KUMAR
ARORA
Date: 2021.02.10
14:57:15 IST
Reason:
ITEM NO.101     Court 10 (Video Conferencing)              SECTION XIV-A

               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                    Civil Appeal   No(s).   7101/2010

BRAHMA NAND SHARMA(D) THR. LR. SUMITRA DEVI             Appellant(s)

                                   VERSUS

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR.                    Respondent(s)


Date : 04-02-2021 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Arun Adlakha, Adv.

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AAG Mrs. Bihu Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the wife of the deceased employee is already aged about 90 years and receiving family pension, we decline to interfere with the said facility provided to her. Let her continue to receive the family pension during her lifetime. With these observations, the appeal stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.




(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA)                              (R.S. NARAYANAN)
     AR-CUM-PS                                       COURT MASTER

(Signed order is placed on the file)