Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Vivek Thakur vs Union Of India & Others on 2 January, 2026

Author: Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench: Saugata Bhattacharyya

02.01.2026
Court No. 02
 Item No.09
(Suvendu)
                            WPA 28700 of 2025


                                VIVEK THAKUR
                                  -Versus-
                         UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS



                    Mr. Debasish Kundu
                                           .....for the petitioner

                    Mr. Ramchandra Agarwal
                    Mr. Tapan Bhanja
                                                  ....for the UOI



               1)   Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the
               petitioner is taken on record.
               2)   Petitioner participated in selection process
               for being appointed as Constable (GD) in
               Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs). In Review
               Medical Examination petitioner was declared
               medically unfit on the ground of Keloid on a
               particular part of body. However, in reference
               to a document at page 24 of the writ petition it
               is submitted that Keloid ought not to be
               considered as a valid ground to declare a
               candidate medically unfit for being appointed
               as Constable (GD) in Central Armed Police
               Forces.
               3)   Union of India is represented by learned
               advocate.
               4)   Concerned     respondent      authority    is

directed to file a report in the form of affidavit disclosing as to why petitioner was declared medically unfit on the ground of Keloid and whether Keloid is one of the grounds as per 2 relevant guidelines to declare a candidate medically unfit for being appointed as Constable (GD) in Central Armed Police Forces. Let such report be filed by three weeks from date.

5) Hearing of this matter stands adjourned.

6) List the matter under the heading "Motion" for further consideration in the Combined Monthly List of February, 2026.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)