Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Arti Devi vs State Of H.P. And Others on 21 March, 2015

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA




                                                                          .
                                            CWP No. 1215 of 2013-B.





                                            Date of decision: 21.03.2015.





    Arti Devi                                                       .....Petitioner.

                                    Versus





    State of H.P. and others                                        .....Respondents.



    Coram


    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?1No
    For the Petitioner              :       Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate.



    For the Respondents :                   Ms.Meenakshi     Sharma  and
                                            Mr.Rupinder Singh, Additional
                                            Advocate Generals.






    Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. (Oral) .

It is represented by learned counsel for the petitioner that this case is squarely covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in LPA No.194 of 2014 titled as State of H.P. and others versus Sudesh Kumari decided on 18.11.2014.

2. This aspect of the matter is required to be considered by the respondents. Accordingly, this writ petition itself is directed to be treated as representation to the respondent No. 2 in light of the averments made therein and also taking into consideration the judgment passed by this Court in Sudesh Kumari' s case supra and make a decision within a period of six weeks from today.

3. Needless to say that the order shall be a speaking one. In the event of order being against the petitioner, she is at liberty to Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:50:42 :::HCHP 2 approach the Court of a competent jurisdiction for the redressal of her grievances.

.

4. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms so also the pending application, if any.

March 21, 2015. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan), (krt) Judge.

                      r           to









                                            ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:50:42 :::HCHP