Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 5]

Chattisgarh High Court

Prahlad Prasad Suryavanshi vs Union Of India 10 Wpc/2807/2018 Vijay ... on 8 October, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                        1

                                                                          NAFR
               HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                            WPC No. 2815 of 2018
     1. Prahlad Prasad Suryavanshi S/o Late Bhangiram Suryavanshi Aged
        About 57 Years R/o Village Paand, Tahsil And District Bilaspur,
        Chhattisgarh.

                                                                 ---- Petitioner
                                 Versus
     1. Union Of India Through Project Director National Highway Authority
        Of India, PIU Abhilasha Parisar Bilaspur District Bilaspur,
        Chhattisgarh.

     2. Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

     3. Vishwanath Prasad Kaushik S/o Late Hemdutt Kaushik Aged About
        65 Years R/o Village Paand, Tahsil, Civil And Revenue District
        Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

                                                              ---- Respondent



For Petitioner                    Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate
For Respondent/NHAI               Ms Fouzia Mirza, Advocate


                               Order On Board
                                     By
                          Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

08/10/2018

1. Admittedly the civil suit concerning dispute of title over the subject land, which is said to be acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), is pending consideration before the jurisdictional civil Court, therefore, the prayer made by the petitioner for stay of the disbursement of the amount of compensation may be moved before the Civil Court in form of prayer under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty as stated supra.

Sd/-

Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri