Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Prasanna Malakar vs The State Of Assam on 13 December, 2021

Author: Rumi Kumari Phukan

Bench: Rumi Kumari Phukan

                                                                               Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010212552021




                               THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : AB/4160/2021

             PRASANNA MALAKAR
             S/O LATE TITHI RAM MALAKAR
             R/O VILL- TITKA TAJE (KANEBARI)
             P.O. DUBI, PIN-781325
             P.S. PATACHARKUCHI,
             DIST. BAJALI, ASSAM



             VERSUS

             THE STATE OF ASSAM
             REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. N K KALITA

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM




                                         :: BEFORE ::
                    HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN

                                          ORDER

13.12.2021 By way of this pre-arrest bail application, the petitioner, namely- Sri Prasanna Malakar has sought for pre-arrest bail in connection with Page No.# 2/2 Patacharkuchi P.S. Case No.232/2016 under Section 466/468/471/420 IPC (G.R. No.462/2016).

Heard the learned counsel for both sides and also perused the documents so annexed.

The informant herein is a third person alleging about irregularity and falsity of the documents procured by the petitioner in his appointment, which is in the year 1990. On the matter, although the petitioner was directed to show cause by the Director of Higher Education, Assam and to which the petitioner also replied to the same in the year 2017, but the petitioner is still continuing in the office as a Laboratory bearer, Bajali College, Pathsala, Barpeta. Reply in the show cause also indicates that the Headmaster of the Debara High School stated about the fact that the petitioner was a student of his school, which has been now impugned in the FIR.

Considering all above, let the case diary he called for, fixing 3 rd week of January, 2022.

In the meantime, the above named petitioner is allowed to go on interim pre- arrest bail of `10,000/-, with one surety of like amount, in the event of his arrest by the arresting officer in connection with the aforesaid case, with further direction to the petitioners to appear before the I/O within 7(seven) days from today for giving his statement and also he shall co-operate with the investigation of the case.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant