Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Md. In Re: Rina Das (Mondal) vs State Of West Bengal And Others on 6 September, 2010

Author: Patherya

Bench: Patherya

10
                                 W.P. 3876 (W) of 2010
     6.9.10
     .md.             In re:       Rina Das (Mondal)
                                      -Vs-
                               State of West Bengal and Others

              Mr. Satyajit Mondal
              Mr. Amar Nath Sen
              Mr. Sanjib Dutta
                         ... for the petitioner


              Ms. Sibani Bhagat
                         ... for the State
                      By this application, the petitioner seeks payment of
              honorarium on and from 12th January, 2010, i.e. for the
              balance days of January, 2010 and February, 2010.


                      The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to an
              advertisement for appointment of Anganwadi Helper, the
              petitioner applied and a panel was prepared. Such panel
              was challenged and an enquiry held. An order has been
              passed on 12th October, 2009 by the District Magistrate,
              cancelling the panel and thereby the entire process of
              recruitment. The petitioner has been paid salary till 11th
              January, 2010 and for the balance days of January, 2010
              and February, 2010 as the petitioner rendered service,
              seeks payment of honorarium along with consideration of
              her application at the time of future recruitment.
                      Counsel for the State-respondents submits that as

the order dated 12th October, 2009 was received by the petitioner by hand and there is no record evidencing the date when such order was received not only by the petitioner but also by the respondent No.9, therefore the petitioner is not entitled to any sums beyond January, 2010.

Having considered the submissions of the parties, as 2 the order was passed on 12th October, 2009 and the honorarium has been paid to the petitioner till 11th January, 2010, the only period for which payment is sought is for the balance days of January, 2010 and February, 2010. As no date is available and the only letter written by the petitioner seeking payment is dated 4th February, 2010, let 3rd February, 2010 be taken as a cut- off date. Accordingly, let the petitioner be paid honorarium on and from 12th January, 2010 till 3rd February, 2010 within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

This order is passed as no documents have been produced by the respondent authorities to evidence the date on which the order dated 12th October, 2009 was communicated either to the respondent No.9 or to the petitioner.

In the event any fresh recruitment is initiated, the directives contained in the order dated 12th October, 2009 be followed.

Urgent certified photocopies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Patherya, J.) 3