Gauhati High Court
The State Of Assam And 2 Ors vs Mohammed Mustafa on 5 March, 2020
Author: Prasanta Kumar Deka
Bench: Prasanta Kumar Deka
Page No.# 1/6
GAHC010038822020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet. 136/2019
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2: THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (WILDLIFE)
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3: THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION
GUWAHATI- 05.
VERSUS
1:MOHAMMED MUSTAFA
S/O- HAJI MD. HANIF
R/O- ISLAMPUR
GUWAHATI- 781007.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H NATH
Linked Case : Review.Pet. 135/2019
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
Page No.# 2/6
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2: THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (WILDLIFE)
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3: THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION
GUWAHATI- 05.
VERSUS
1:M/S OASIS ENTERPRISES
A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT A. K. ROAD
DHIRENPARA
GUWAHATI-22
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SARFARZ ALI
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H NATH
Linked Case : Review.Pet. 139/2019
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2: THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (WILDLIFE)
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3: THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION
GUWAHATI- 05.
VERSUS
Page No.# 3/6
1:SRI KISHOR SINGH
S/O- LATE RAGHU PRASAD SINGH
R/O- NOONMATI BISNU RABHA NAGAR
GUWAHATI- 781120.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H NATH
Linked Case : Review.Pet. 137/2019
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2: THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (WILDLIFE)
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3: THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION
GUWAHATI- 05.
VERSUS
1:SANJIV KR. ROY
S/O- SRI LAKHINDAR RAY
R/O- SENAPATI ROAD
SILPUKHRI
GUWAHATI- 781003.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H NATH
Linked Case : Review.Pet. 138/2019
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
Page No.# 4/6
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2: THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (WILDLIFE)
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3: THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION
GUWAHATI- 05.
VERSUS
1:SRI RANJIT KAUSHIK
S/O- LATE DHIREN SABHAPANDIT
R/O- H/NO. 10
PINAKI PATH
ZOO ROAD TINIALI
GUWAHATI
DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM- 781003.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H NATH
Linked Case : Review.Pet. 134/2019
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2: THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (WILDLIFE)
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3: THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION
GUWAHATI- 05.
Page No.# 5/6
VERSUS
1:MD. KASAIM
S/O- LATE HAJI KAMRUDDIN
R/O- NEAR GMC MARKET
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI- 781008.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H NATH
Linked Case : Review.Pet. 140/2019
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
2: THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (WILDLIFE)
ASSAM
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37.
3: THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION
GUWAHATI- 05.
VERSUS
1:MD. YASIN
S/O- LATE HAJI IMBRAHIM
R/O- NOTBOMBA
SIJUBARI
HATIGAON
GUWAHATI- 781038.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H NATH
Page No.# 6/6
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
ORDER
05.03.2020 Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam submits that notice on respondents in Review Pet./139/2019 and Review Pet./140/2019 are yet to be issued. Accordingly, she sought the leave of this court to take steps on the said respondents by way of Dasti service which is accordingly allowed.
The petitioner shall take steps by way of Dasti service on the respondents in Review Pet./139/2019 and Review Pet./140/2019 within a period of three days from today after routing the same through the Registry.
Mr. D. Das, the learned Senior Counsel is present on behalf of all the respondents in Review Pet./134/2019 to Review Pet./137/2019.
It is submitted by Ms. Bhattacharjee that the learned counsel for respondent had entered appearance in Review Pet./138/2019.
List on 26.03.2020.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant