Supreme Court of India
Unni Krishnan J.P. And Others vs State Of A.P. And Others on 14 May, 1993
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 1993 SC 42, 1993 (4) SCC 111
Bench: S. Ratnavel Pandian, S.C. Agrawal, S. Mohan, B.P. Jeevan Reddy
CASE NO.: Review Petition (civil) 483 of 1993 PETITIONER: UNNI KRISHNAN J.P. AND OTHERS RESPONDENT: STATE OF A.P. AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/05/1993 BENCH: S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN & S.C. AGRAWAL & S. MOHAN & B.P. JEEVAN REDDY & S.P. BHARUCHA JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT in Writ Petition No. 678 of 1993 ...Etc., decided on (1993) 4 SCC 111
1. The Scheme framed by this Court in its judgment dated February 4, 1993 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 607 of 19921 and connected matters is modified to the following extent only.
2. It shall be open to the professional college to admit Non-Resident Indian students to the extent of only five per cent of their total intake for a given year. By way of illustration if the permitted intake of a professional college is 100 for a given year, 50 seats out of it will be free seats and other 50 seats will be seats on payment. The five seats for Non-Resident Indian students shall be out of the 50 payment seats. The Non- Resident Indian students shall be admitted on the basis of merit. But in view of the different backgrounds they come from it is for the management of the college concerned to judge the merit of these candidates, having regard to the relevant factors. The fees payable by such students shall be as may be prescribed by the Committee referred to in clause (6) of the Scheme.
3. The Non-Resident Indian students admitted against these 5 seats need not however take the entrance examination, if any prescribed for admission to that course. It is made clear that the above provision does not preclude the Non-Resident Indian students from seeking admission either to free seats or payment seats along with others on the basis common to all. The observations made in Mohini Jain case2 in relation to Non-Resident Indian students will stand modified to the above extent.
4. Subject to the above, all the review petitions and IAs are dismissed. No costs.