Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Vikramsingh vs State on 28 March, 2011

Author: Anant S. Dave

Bench: Anant S. Dave

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/665/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 665 of 2011
 

 
 
=================================================


 

VIKRAMSINGH
KANJIBHAI THAKORE - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=================================================
 
Appearance : 
THROUGH
JAIL for Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR AJ DESAI APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
================================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 21/03/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER 

Heard learned APP for the respondent - State of Gujarat and perused the petition sent through jail.

This application is preferred by the petitioner with a prayer to grant Parole leave for a period of 60 days to get his house repaired. His application was rejected by the authority on the ground that no opinion was received from the District Superintendent of Police, Banaskantha at Palanpur.

The jail record submitted by the Superintendent, District Jail, Mehsana annexed with the application reveals that the petitioner was convicted for the offences punishable under section 307 r/w. Section 114 of the IPC and overall jail conduct of the petitioner is reasonably good. Even during the pendency of appeal, the petitioner was on bail from 20.10.2003 to 04.08.2008 and only once he surrendered late by few hours before the jail authority.

Considering the requirement and what is stated in the application and the communication received from his relatives of the village and certificate issued by the Talati-cum-Mantri, Sirohi, Gram Pnachayat, Taluka Kankrej, District Banaskantha about need for repairing the house, I am inclined to grant parole for a period of 15 days from the date of his release by imposing suitable conditions to the satisfaction of the jail authority, including furnishing a security of Rs.2,000/- and surety of like amount. Upon completion of the parole leave, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Authority.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed.

[Anant S. Dave, J.] *pvv     Top