Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras

S Murali vs M/O Finance on 13 January, 2023

ru

I

OA 310/00371/2021

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CHENNAI BENCH

OA/310/00371/2021

Dated Friday the 13" day of January Two Thousand Twenty Three

CORAM : HON'BLE MS. MANJULA DAS, Member (J)

&

HON'BLE MR. T. JACOB, Member (A)

1S. Murali

2. Daleel Ahmed

3. Uma Maheswari

4, D. Kumaraswamy
5. K.R. Prakasam

6. A. Muralidhara Rao
7. Y. Sudhakar Rao

8. L. Paneerselvam

9, P. Kanakavel

10. K. Moganan

11. B.S. Balavinayagam
12. P. N. Swaminathan
13. T.S. Janaki

14. R. Arun Singh

15. Susan Verghese
16. S. Rajasekaran

17. G. Jayaraman

18. R.R. Kesava Rao
19. R. Varadhan

20, G. Ramaswamy
21. Bojja Joseph

22. T. Ananthan

23. T. Perumal

24, E, Chandrasekar
25, Indra Ramesh

26. T. Raju

27. P. Jayapalan

28. J. Babu

29, M. Panneerselvam
30. G, Sekar

31. G. Navaneethakrishnan

32. Kk. Balaraman
33. R. Padmanaban



Cert

34. R. Jothi Ram

35. B. Loganathan

36. P. Senthamaraikannan
37. A. Murugan

38. V. Mani

39. S.M. Aejaz Mohamed
40, E. Ganapathi

41. A. Muthukrishnan

42. N. Sethuraj

43. R. Rangarajan

44. Woolridge Lindsay Barry

45. G. Ravisankar

46, T. Veerapandian
47. P. Somanathan

48. J. Sivakumar

49. P. Rajendiran

50. S. Tamilmani

31. A. Roshan Khan
52. 8. Gajendran

53. 1, Meenatchi

54, K. Doraisamy

55. R, Kanagaraj

56. G. Sekar

57. R. Vijayakumar
58. P. Ramakrishnan
59. R. Jayabalaswamy
60. P. Subramanian
61. P. Vajravelu

62. AK. Jaaganathan
63. V. Rajendran

64, PB. Sarvodhin

65. P. Ravindran

66. Srinivasan Venkateshan
67. A.M. Krishnamoorthy
68. M. Vijayalakshmi
69. C. Thirumalaiswamy
70. G. Bazul Ashhab
71.8. Balamurali

72. Antony Lawrence
73. R. Ganesan

74, N. Rajendran

75. K. Manian

76. C. Rajan

77. P, Devarajan

OA 310/00371/2021



3 OA 310/00371/2021

78. V.P. Veluswamy
79. §. Tangovan

80. M. Sbramanian

81. R. Cahndhiramoorthi
82. V. Natarajan

$3. S. Kannappan

84. S. Duraisamy

85. R. Mani

86, M. Muruganandham
87. V. Govindsamy

88. M. Gopal

89. M. Ramasamy ... Applicants

By Advocate M/s. S. Sankaranarayanan
Vs

1. Union of India
Represented by the Secretary
Department of Revenue
Ministry of Finance

New Delhi -- 110 001.

2. The Chairman
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
North Block, New Delhi -- 110 001.

3. The Principal Chief Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
Tamilnadu & Pondicherry

121, Uthmar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Road

Chennai 600 034.

4, The Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs, Custom House
Rajaji Salai, Chennaj -- 600 001.

5. The Principal Commissioner of Customs,
Custom Commissionerate -- VIII

Custom House

Rajaji Salai, Chennai -- 600 001.

6. The Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
Chennai South Commissionerate

MHU Complex, 692 Anna Salai

Nandanam, Chennai -- 600 035.



4 OA 310/00371/2021

7. The Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
Chennai Outer Commissionerate

Newry Towers

2054, I Block, 2"? Avenue

Anna Nagar, Chennai -- 600 040.

8. The Additional Director General
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
No, 27, GN Chetty Road, T:Nagar
Chennai -- 600 017.

9, The Additional Director General
Directorate of GST Intelligence (OGGI)
Chennai Zonal Unit, V and VII Floor
Tower If, BSNL Building

No. 16, Greams Road

Chennai -- 600 006.

10. The Principal Commissianer of GST & Central Excise
GST Audit I Commisionerate

No. 1775, Jawaharlal Nehru Inner Ring Road

Anna Nagar West Extension

Chennai 600 101,

11. The Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
GST Audit-IT Commissionerate ;

692, Anna Salai, MHU Complex

GST Nilayam, Nandanam

Chennai -- 600 035.

12. The Principal Commissioner of Central Excise & GST
6/7 ATD Street, Race Course Road
Coimbatore 641018.

13. The Principal Commissioner of Central Excise & GST
Trichy Commissionerate
No, 1, Williams Road, Trichy -620 001.

14, The Principal Commissioner of Customs
Trichy Commissionerate
No. 1, Williams Road, Trichy -620 001.

15, The Principal Commissioner /Commissioner of Customs



5 OA 310/00371/2021

Tuticorin Commissionerate
Custom House, Tuticorin -628 004.

16. The Principal Commissioner /

Commissioner of Central Excise & GST

Madurai Commissionerate and Tirunelveli Sub Commissionerate
No. 4, Lalbahadur Shastry Road

Revenue Buildings, B.B. Kulam, Madurai 625 002.

17. The Principal Commissioner/
Commissioner of GST and Central Excise
Coimbatore Audit Commissionerate

6/7, ATD Street, Race Course Road
Coimbatore -- 600 018.

18, The Commissionerate of GST & Central Excise
1, Foulkes Compound
Anai Road, Anaimedu, Salem -- 636 001: -. Respondents

By Advocate Mr. Umesh Rao. K



6 OA 310/00371/2021

ORAL ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Ms. Manjula Das, Member(J)) The reliefs prayed for in this OA is as follows:

"i. To call for the records from the respondents who issued letters denying the notional one increment to the applicants and set aside the same-as arbitrary and illegal. ii. To direct the respondents to consider and dispose of all the representations submitted to them by the applicants within a reasonable period.
iii, To direct the respondents to grant the benefit of one notional increment to the applicants at the earliest with all consequential reliefs iv, To issue appropriate directions or orders which this Honorable Tribunal deems fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case to meet the ends of justice and v. To award costs to the applicants."

2. The applicants in this OA are aggrieved by the refusal of the respondents to consider their representations for the grant of one Notional increment on their retirement on 30" June during the period from 2007 to 2020. Leaned counsel for the applicant submits that thought the issue is settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the respondents were not extending similar benefits to the similarly placed officers. It is submitted that the respondents in this OA have refused to grant the notional increment to most of the applicants herein stating that the judgment in the 7 OA 310/00371/2021 Ayyamperumal case is in personam and not in rem. Some of the applicants are yet to receive replies from the respondents. Hence this OA.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant by producing a copy of the order of this Tribunal passed in O.A. 426 of 2010 dated 01.09.2020 submits that the issue involved in instant case is squarely covered by the above decision of the Tribunal and drawn our attention to the operative portion of the order in OA No. 426/2020 which is extracted hereunder:-

"ll. For the foregoing reasons, the O.A. is allowed, directing that the applicant, who retired from service on 30.06.2014, shall be extended the increment payable on 1* July of the respective year. His pension shall also be revised, subject to fulfilment of other conditions, which are applicable. The arrears that become due shall be paid without interest. While extending such benefits, a clause shall be incorporated to the effect that in case the Hon'ble Supreme Court takes a different view in the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP No. 4722/2021, he Shall be under obligation to refund the entire benefit without any demur, The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant would be satisfied if a similar direction is passed in this matter also. 4, Counsel representing learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.

5. On perusal of the OA it is seen that this issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Tribunal in OA 426/2020 dated 01.09.2021 and it is appropriate to pass similar order in this matter also. ee EE t} 8 OA 310/00371/2021

6. In view of the above, the O.A. is allowed, directing that the applicants, who retired from service on 30" June during the period from 2007 to 2020, shall be extended the increment payable on 1* July of the respective year. His pension shall also be revised, subject to fulfilment of other conditions, which are applicable. The arrears that become due shall be paid without interest. While extending such benefits, a clause shall be incorporated to the effect that in case the Hon'ble Supreme Court takes a r different view in the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP No. 4722/2021, they shall be under obligation to refund the entire benefit without any demur. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt ofa copy of this order. No costs. _ | W