Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Raigad District Central Co-Op Bank Ltd vs M.T Saint Regis(Ex-Name Dolphin Pride ... on 3 August, 2018

Author: R.M.Chhaya

Bench: R.M.Chhaya

          C/AS/30/2018                         ORDER



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/ADMIRALITY SUIT NO.  30 of 2018

===================================================
       RAIGAD DISTRICT CENTRAL CO­OP BANK LTD
                        Versus
   M.T SAINT REGIS(EX­NAME DOLPHIN PRIDE (IMO NO 
                       9495272)
===================================================
Appearance:
MR. PRATHAMESH KAMAT, Advocate with MR SHIVKUMAR 
IYER with MS ADITI MAHESHWARI with  MS PAURAMI B 
SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Plaintiff(s) No. 1
for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
===================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
 
                  Date : 03/08/2018
 
                      ORAL ORDER

1. Learned   Advocate   Ms.   Paurami   B.   Sheth  mentioned this matter today for urgent circulation.  The   permission   is   granted   for   urgent   circulation  and suit is taken up for hearing for urgent interim  orders.

2. The   Ld.   counsel   for   the   Plaintiff   seeks  permission   to   place   on   record   further   documents.  The   plaintiff   shall   file   the   documents   with   the  Registry within two weeks from today.

3. The   learned   counsel   for   the   plaintiff  submitted that the Plaintiff has sanctioned loan of  a sum of Term Loan of Rs.11,75,00,000/­ to  Modest  and Parson International Pvt. Ltd., that Modest &  Page 1 of 5 C/AS/30/2018 ORDER Parson, inter­alia, pledged the Defendant vessel to  the   Plaintiff   vide   Hypothecation   Deed   dated   30th  December 2015 who are the registered owners of the  Defendant   Vessel,   that   said   Modest   and   Parson  International  Pvt. Ltd. has defaulted  on the loan  disbursed   to   them   and   hence   the   Plaintiff   was  constrained to declare the account as NPA and also  recalled   the   loan,   that   it   has   failed   to   pay  thereafter   also   despite   repeated   reminders   and  hence   the   Plaintiff   was   constrained   to   initiate  measures   against   Modest   &   Parson   under   the  provisions   of   the   Maharashtra   Co­operative  Societies   Act   1960   read   with   the   Maharashtra   Co­ operative   Societies   Rules,   that   pursuant   to   the  above   proceedings,   the   Deputy   Registrar,   Co­op.  Societies,   Alibaug,   Raigad   passed   order   dated  14.03.2017 under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co­ operative   Societies   Act   1960   whereby   the  Plaintiff's   mortgage   /   hypothecation   was  acknowledged,   thus   the   Plaintiff   has     secured  creditor of Modest & Parson i.e. the owner of the  Defendant   vessel   and   has   a   priority   mortgage   /  hypothecation with one Karnala Nagari Sahakari Bank  Ltd. over the same, thus the Plaintiff has maritime  claim   /   maritime   lien   arising   on   account   of   the  registered Mortgage created on the Defendant Vessel  for loan disbursed to registered Owner, Modest and  Parson International Pvt. Ltd. and the present suit  is filed for outstanding  amount with interest  and  costs   as   per   particulars   of   claim   from   the  Defendant Vessel and her owner.

Page 2 of 5 C/AS/30/2018 ORDER

4. Upon   hearing   Mr.   Prathamesh   Kamat,   learned  Counsel   for   the   Plaintiff   and   upon   reading   the  plaint   herein   declared   at   Ahmedabad   on   03.08.2018  filed by the advocate for the Plaintiff herein and  the affidavit of Mr. Bharat Ramchandra Nandgaonkar,  Authorized Person of the Plaintiff above named upon  the Plaintiff giving an undertaking in writing  to  the Registrar of this Court to pay such sums by way  of damages as this Court may award as compensation  in the event of the defendants sustaining prejudice  by   this   order,   I   do   order   that   the   Registrar   of  this Court do issue a warrant for the arrest of the  defendant   vessel,   M.   T.   Saint   Regis   (Ex   Dolphin  Pride)   (IMO   No   9495272)   along   with   her   hull,  engines,   gears,   tackles,   bunkers,   machinery,  apparel,   plant,   furnitures,   equipments   and   all  appurtenances,   at   present   lying   at   the   Port   at  Deendayal   and   that   the   Warrant   of   Arrest   be  executed   at   any   time   of   the   day   or   night   or   on  Sundays or holidays and I do further order that the  Port   Officer   and   the   Customs   Authorities   at  Deendayal   do   effect   the   arrest,   seizure   or  detention of the defendant Vessel M. T. Saint Regis  at Deendayal Port or such other place wherever she  may be within the territorial waters of India and I  do further order that in the event of the defendant  and/ or those interested in her depositing in this  Court  the  principal   amount   of   Rs.   12,29,66,071/­  together   with   interest   for   delayed   payment   for   a  sum of Rs. 56,80,361/­  and Legal costs & Expenses  Page 3 of 5 C/AS/30/2018 ORDER aggregating   to   total   amount   of   Rs.13,56,46,432/­  with further interest on Rs. 12,86,46,432/­ at the  rate   of   13   %   p.a.   from   the   date   of   suit   until  payment/realisation   as   per   Particulars   of   Claim,  the   said   Warrant   of   Arrest   shall   not   be   executed  against the defendant Vessel M. T. Saint Regis.

5. The   Port   Officer   and   the   Customs   Authorities  at Deendayal are directed to arrest the vessel M.  T. Saint Regis at present lying at Deendayal Port  within the territorial waters of India and to keep  the   vessel   under   arrest   until   further   orders   of  this   Court.   It   is   further   ordered   that   the   Port  Officer and the Customs Officer at Deendayal shall  render   all   assistance   to   the   Plaintiff   or   its  representative   in   effecting   the   warrant   of   arrest  on the Defendant vessel.

6. It   is   open   for   the   Plaintiff's   advocate   to  communicate the above order by fax message/Email at  their own cost and the authorities are directed to  act on fax/Email message with an ordinary copy of  this order.

7. The undertaking filed by Mr. Bharat Ramchandra  Nandgaonkar, Authorised Person of the Plaintiff is  taken on record.

8. Notice   to   the   Defendant   returnable   on  10.08.2018. It is made clear that it will be open  for the defendant to approach this Court even prior  Page 4 of 5 C/AS/30/2018 ORDER to the returnable date with adequate notice to the  plaintiff.

9. Office   is   directed   to   serve   the   warrant   of  arrest   on   the   Master   of   the   Vessel   M.   T.   Saint  Regis or through the agent of the vessel and send  copy   thereof   to   Port   and   Customs   Authorities   at  Deendayal.

Direct service is permitted today.

(R.M.CHHAYA, J) MAULIK R. PANDYA Page 5 of 5