Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Nagalambike vs Bangalore Metropolitan Region on 20 September, 2019

Author: H T Narendra Prasad

Bench: H. T. Narendra Prasad

                                 1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019

                           BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD

      WRIT PETITION Nos.34396-400 OF 2017 (LB-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.     Nagalambike
       Aged about 62 years
       W/o Late I. Mahabaleswarappa

2.     Manu Ittina
       Aged about 36 years
       S/o Late I. Mahabaleswarappa
3.     Mona Ittina
       Aged about 33 years,
       D/o Late I. Mahabaleswarappa

4.     Mahadev Ittina
       Aged about 28 years,
       S/o Late I. Mahabaleswarappa

5.     I. Veeresh
       Aged about 40 years,
       S/o. I. Amarappa
       All are residing at
       Ittina House,
       Kaikondrahalli Village,
       Sarjapura Road,
       Bengaluru-560 035.                 ...Petitioners

(By Sri. Nitin Prasad, Advocate
  for Sri. Suryanarayana T, Advocate)
                               2



AND:

1.     Bangalore Metropolitan Region
       Development Authority
       No.1, Ali Askar Road,
       LRDE Building,
       Bengaluru-560 052
       Represented by its Commissioner

2.     Anekal Planning Authority
       Anna, No.430, Hennagara Cross,
       Hosur Main Road
       Bengaluru-560 099
       Represented by its Chairman

3.     The State of Karnataka
       Vidhana Soudha
       Bengaluru-560 001
       Department of Urban and Rural Development
       Represented by its
       Principal Secretary.

4.     Yamare Gram Panchayat,
       Yamare village,
       Dommasandra Post,
       Sarjapur Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
       Bengaluru-562 125
       Represented herein by its
       President.

5.     M/s. Emerald Group
       No. 40, 14th Main,
       7th Sector, HSR Layout,
       Bengaluru-560 102
       Represented by its Partner,
       Satish Kumar Nandagopal.          ... Respondents

(By Sri. Yogesh D. Naik, Advocate for R1 and R2)
                              3



     These writ petitions are filed under Article 226 and
227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct
respondents No.1 and 2 to Act on the letters dated
22.11.2014, 04.05.2015 and 20.10.2015 at Annexure-F, J
and K by the petitioners and etc.,

     These petitions coming on for Orders    this day, the
Court made the following:

                         ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 18.09.2019 seeking permission to withdraw the petitions.

Memo is placed on record. In view of the memo filed, petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE MBM