Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Telco Construction Co Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner on 9 December, 2022

Bench: Alok Aradhe, H T Narendra Prasad

                                                -1-
                                                                 RP No.95 of 2021




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                             DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022
                                              PRESENT
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
                                                AND
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
                                  REVIEW PETITION NO. 95 OF 2021
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   M/S TELCO CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.,
                           (NOW KNOWN AS TATA HITACHI
                           CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO. PVT. LTD)
                           45, JUBILEE BUILDING, MUSEUM ROAD
                           BENGALURU-560025
                           REPRESENTED BY ITS
                           MANAGING DIRECTOR
                           SRI SANDEEP SINGH
                           AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
Digitally signed by        S/O SRI JOGINDER SINGH JOGI.
B A KRISHNA
KUMAR
Location: High                                                      ...PETITIONER
Court of Karnataka
                      (BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL FOR
                          SRI. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                           OF INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-12(4)
                           NO.14/3, 4TH FLOOR
                           RASTROTHANABHAVAN
                           (OPP.RBI), NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
                           BENGALURU-560001.

                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE FOR
                          SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
                              -2-
                                           RP No.95 of 2021




     THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47
RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE
JUDGMENT DATED 20/11/2020 PASSED IN ITA NO.101/2016.
PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE
COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED ON THE FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
AND EQUITY.


     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                          ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated 20.11.2020 passed in ITA No.101/2016.

2. After hearing learned counsel for the PARTIES, the order of which review is sought does not suffer from any infirmity nor any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference of this court in exercise of review jurisdiction.

-3- RP No.95 of 2021

Accordingly, the re-view petition fails and is hereby dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE SS