Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Saral Enterprises-Iii vs The Asstt.Commissiner Of Income-Tax on 17 December, 2021

Bench: K.R. Shriram, Amit B. Borkar

         Digitally
         signed by                                  1/2                        230-itxa-281-02.doc
         MEERA
MEERA    MAHESH
MAHESH   JADHAV
JADHAV   Date:
         2021.12.18           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         10:37:45
         +0530                   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                   INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2002
                                                WITH
                                   INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2002
                                                WITH
                                   INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2002
                                                WITH
                                   INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 300 OF 2002


             M/s Saral Enterprises-IIT                       ....Appellant

                       V/s.

             The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax           ...Respondents

                                                ----

Mr. A. R. Singh & Mr. Gobinda C. Mohanty i/b Mohanty & Associates for Appellant Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents

----

CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 17th DECEMBER 2021 P.C. :

1 After the appeals were heard for sometime, Mr. Singh sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeals with a plea that the Tribunal having rejected appellant's submissions for deduction of the interest paid on accrual basis, appellant should be permitted to approach the authorities to claim benefit in the year the interest amount was paid on cash basis. 2 It is open to appellant to make whatever representations or file any plea before the concerned authorities and naturally, those authorities will consider the plea in accordance with law. We are not making any Meera Jadhav 2/2 230-itxa-281-02.doc observations or passing any directions to the authorities how such a request should be considered or dealt with.
3 Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.

(AMIT B. BORKAR, J) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Meera Jadhav