Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Dr.Yoonus Kunju Mytheen Kunju Shibnu vs Medical Council Of India on 18 February, 2026

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                             2026:KER:14480

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
 WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 29TH MAGHA, 1947
                         WP(C) NO. 9853 OF 2019

PETITIONER:

     1       DR.YOONUS KUNJU MYTHEEN KUNJU SHIBNU
             AGED 45 YEARS
             S/O. YOONUS KUNJU,
             M.M. MANZIL, PAYIKUZHI,
             OACHIRA P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT

     2       DR. KARUVANTE VALAPPIL NAVAS
             AGED 35 YEARS
             S/O. HYDROSE K.V.
             KARUVANTE VALAPPIL HOUSE,
             MOOKKUTHALA VADAKKUMURI,
             MOOKKUTHALA P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT

             BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM


RESPONDENTS:

     1       MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
             SECTOR 8, POCKET-14, DWARAKA,
             NEW DELHI -110 075,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR

     2       TRAVANCORE COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL
             RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 035,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR

     3       THE REGISTRAR
             TRAVANCORE COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 035


             BY ADV SHRI.TITUS MANI


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   18.02.2026,   THE    COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED    THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                               2026:KER:14480
W.P(C) No.9853 of 2019
                                   -:2:-

                     BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                   ----------------------------------------
                       W.P(C) No.9853 of 2019
                   ----------------------------------------
               Dated this the 18th day of February, 2026


                              JUDGMENT

Petitioners are registered Medical Practitioners under the Medical Council of India, who obtained their Bachelors Degree from Universities outside the country. By the impugned orders, the second respondent issued a general notice stating that all Doctors who obtained the qualifications of M.D Physician, M.D. Doctor of Medicine, from abroad, which are equivalent only to MBBS in India, to include as a suffix with their name and Degree 'equivalent to MBBS in India'. By Exhibit-P8, the third respondent issued specific letters addressed to various Doctors who obtained their medical qualification from outside India, to include the term 'equivalent to MBBS in India' along with their name and Degree.

2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the stipulation to include the terms 'equivalent to MBBS in India' as a suffix to their name and Degree, and hence approached this Court, questioning the authority of respondents to issue such a directive.

3. I have heard Sri. George Abraham, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Prenjith Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent, Sri. Vivek Manon, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3 and Sri. Rajeev Jyothish George, the learned 2026:KER:14480 W.P(C) No.9853 of 2019 -:3:- Government Pleader.

4. The question as to whether the respondents have the authority to direct inclusion of the terms 'equivalent to MBBS in India' was considered by a Division Bench of this Court in Ramakrishna Babu M. (Dr.) and Others V. Medical Council of India and Others [2018 (4) KLT 775]. After elaborately considering the said issue, the Division Bench came to the following conclusions:

"6. It is worth noting that the learned Standing Counsel Sri. N. Raghuraj appearing for the Travancore - Cochin Medical Council has failed to show us any provision which permits the State Medical Council to require the doctors, who qualified from foreign institution, to display in their name board or in their letter heads that, their Degree of M.D. Physician is, equivalent to the MBBS Degree. The counsel however, submits that if such indication is not given in the name boards and in the letter heads, there is every possibility of the public or patients being misguided as to the qualification of the doctor and they might erroneously consider the concerned doctor to be specialist or a doctor with Post Graduate Degree in Medicine.
7. The perceived misunderstanding regarding the qualification of the doctor may not by itself, be a justification for the State Medical Council to insist on the doctors, who have obtained their Degree from foreign institution, to make changes in their name boards or in their letter heads since it is not the case of the State Medical Council that the doctors had not obtained the displayed Degrees or they attempted to mislead the public. In fact, the doctors were displaying their precise 2026:KER:14480 W.P(C) No.9853 of 2019 -:4:- qualification in their prescriptions as well as in the name boards and the projected information appears to conform to the Ext.R2(b) communication of the MCI, issued on 16.7.2015.
8. For the above reasons, we feel that the impugned judgment to the extent it upholds Exts. P13 and P14 of the State Medical Council, requiring the doctors to effect changes in their letter heads and name boards, is not supported by the MCI Regulations or the guidelines issued by the MCI. We, therefore, set aside that part of the impugned judgment. It is nevertheless made clear that the writ petitioners / appellants should submit their Registration Certificates to the State Medical Council to obtain an endorsement thereon to the effect that their Degree of M.D. Physician or similar Degree from foreign university, is equivalent to the MBBS Degree in India. It is ordered accordingly."

5. The above decision applies in all its vigour in the instant case also, as the petitioner stands on the same footing as the petitioners in those appeals.

6. In view of the above, Exhibit-P3, Exhibgit-P4, Exhibgit-P7 and Exhibit-P8 orders issued by the third respondent are quashed. In the absence of any guideline to the contrary either by MCI or regulations of MCI, it is declared that petitioners are entitled to affix the qualifications after their name as M. D. Physician. It is however, directed that the petitioners shall submit their Registration Certificates to the State Medical Council to obtain an endorsement 2026:KER:14480 W.P(C) No.9853 of 2019 -:5:- thereon, to the effect that their Degree of M.D. Physician or similar Degree from foreign University, is equivalent to the MBBS Degree in India.

Writ petition is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE jka/18.02.26.

2026:KER:14480 W.P(C) No.9853 of 2019 -:6:- APPENDIX OF W.P.(C). NO.9853 OF 2019 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY THE TRAVANCORE COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL, DATED 24-4-2013.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER BY THE TRAVANCORE COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL, DATED 15-6-2013.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 06-7-2015 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 22- 5-2015 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPOY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11-05-2015.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITION NO.24623/18.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 15/6/2017.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 20.11.2017.