Karnataka High Court
Mr. C P Yogeshwara vs Serious Fraud Investigation Office on 26 February, 2026
Author: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav
Bench: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:12021
CRL.P No. 15588 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15588 OF 2025
(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1. MR. C. P. YOGESHWARA,
S/O SHRI PUTTA MADEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
NO.143, 17TH MAIN,
BSK 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560070.
COMPLAINT ADDRESS:
464, 1ST G CROSS, 2 ND PHASE,
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560085.
2. MR. C.P. GANGADHARESHWARA
Digitally S/O SHRI PUTTAMADEGOWDA,
signed by AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
VIJAYA P
NO.367, 1ST E CROSS, 6TH BLOCK,
Location:
HIGH BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE,
COURT OF HOSAKEREHALLI 2ND PHASE,
KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560085.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VIVEKANANDA N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE,
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS,
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:12021
CRL.P No. 15588 of 2025
HC-KAR
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
2ND FLOOR, PARYAVARAN BHAWAN,
CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD,
NEW DELHI 110003,
REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,
MR. SAUMENDRA KUMAR NANDA.
2. M/S. MEGACITY (BENGALURU)
DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS LIMITED,
HAVING OFFICE AT MEGA TOWER,
120, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560027,
REPRESENTED BY ITS NOMINEE DIRECTOR,
SRI. C. V. SANJEEVAN.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
29.10.2025 PASSED BY XLII ACJM, BENGALURU IN
CC.NO.30793/2021 PRODUCED FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 409 OF IPC AS ANNEXURE-A
AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:12021
CRL.P No. 15588 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
Sri. Vikram Huilgol, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. However, it is submitted that they would reserve their right to approach the trial Court and make a request as is permissible in terms of Section 313 (5) of Cr.P.C.
2. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, petition is disposed of, as not calling for any further adjudication.
3. Pending I.A.s are disposed of, as not calling for any adjudication, in light of disposal of the main petition.
SD/-
(S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR