Patna High Court - Orders
Mukul Kumar Pandey vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 24 April, 2012
Author: Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Bench: Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Patna High Court CWJC No.22132 of 2011 (2) dt.24-04-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22132 of 2011
======================================================
1. Mukul Kumar Pandey Son Of Sri Ram Kishore Pandey Resident Of
Village Valmikinagar, At And P.O. Valmikinagar West Champaran Bettiah
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Human Resource
Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna
2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate West Champaran, Bettiah
4. The District Superintendent Of Education West Champaran, Bettiah
5. The District Education Officer West Champaran Bettiah
6. The Block Development Officer, (Bagaha - 2) District West Champaran,
Bettiah
7. The Block Education Extension Officer, (Bagha -2) West Champaran,
Bettiah
8. The Block Education Development Officer, (Bagaha -2) West
Champaran Betiah
9. The Mukhiya, Valmikinagar Gram Panchayat , Block Bagaha - 2 P.S.
Valmikinagar, West Champaran, Bettiah
10. The Panchayat Secretary, Valmikinagar Gram Panchayat, Block Bagaha
- 2, P.S. Valmikinagar West Champaran Bettiah
11. The District Appellate Authority (Teachers Appointment) West
Champaran Bettiah
12. Mohd, Rahmat Ali S/O Ismail Resident Of Dumbar Ban, P.O.
Pakridayal, P.S. Pakridayal, West Champaran, Bettiah
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar Aag10
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR
TRIPATHI
ORAL ORDER
2 24-04-2012Non appointment or selection of the petitioner has become the issue or grievance based on which a complaint had been filed by him before the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Bettiah. This has been registered as complaint no. 128 of 2011.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22132 of 2011 (2) dt.24-04-2012
Grievance of the petitioner is that the adjudication has not been made by the Appellate Authority so far and, therefore, this writ application.
This writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Appellate Authority that after hearing the parties to the dispute the Appellate Authority will render its decision on the dispute preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
This writ application stands disposed of.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Amin/-