Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Ismail Construction Company(P) Ltd., vs Ravi Shankar Shukla S/O Lalit & Others on 16 December, 2013

  
 
 
 
 
 
 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA






  
            	



 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

STATE CONSUMER
    DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
    
   
    
     
     

CIRCUIT BENCH
    AT NAGPUR
    
   
    
     
     

5 TH FLOOR,
    ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
    
   
    
     
     

CIVIL LINES,
    NAGPUR-440 001
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

First Appeal
      No. A/02/113
      
     
      
       
       

(Arisen out
      of Order Dated 12/11/2001 in Case No. CC/1997/404 of
      District Forum, Nagpur)
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       

Ismail Construction Company(P) Ltd.,
       

101, New Bazar, First Floor,
       

Besides Karachi Stores, Sadar,
       

Nagpur-01 through it's Director,
       

Shri Mohamad
      Ismail S/o Shaikh
       

Ibrahim, R/o. Sadar,
      Nagpur.
      ...... Appellant(s)
       


       
       


      Versus 
       

  
       

1.

Ravi Shankar Shukla s/o Lalit Shukla, R/o. Quarter No. 4/52, Seminary Hills, Nagpur.

 

2. S.K. Sirajuddin, R/o. 25-P/62, G.W.T. Street, Borgaon, Nagpur-440 013.

 

3. The Managing and other Partners Of M/s. The Construction World Real Estates Corporation, 101, New Bazar, First Floor, Besides Karachi Stores, Sadar, Nagpur-440 001.

 

4. Shri Rajesh Krishnarao Yawalkar, R/o. Village & Post Mohpa, Tah. Kalmeshwar, Distt. Nagpur.

 

5. Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Civil Lines, Nagpur through Commissioner, N.M.C. ...... Respondent(s)     BEFORE:

   
HON'ABLE MR. B.A.Shaikh PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER   PRESENT:
 
ORDER (Delivered on 16/12/2013) PER SHRI B.A. SHAIKH, HON'BLE PRESIDING MEMBER.
None present for the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Adv. Mr. A.P.J.P. Dube appeared for the respondent No.5 and he made a grievance that he has not received copy of appeal compilation from the appellant. Moreover, on last date also appellant's Adv. had appeared at late hour when the appeal was recalled for appropriate order. On last date direction was given to the appellant to file 2 set of the appeal compilation for the use of this Commission. The said direction is not complied. Therefore, appeal deserves to be dismissed in default. Appeal be recalled at 3.00 p.m. for order.
 
Appeal is recalled at 3.45 p.m. for order. Presently also none appeared for the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed in default.
Dated:- 16/12/2013.
   
[HON'ABLE MR. B.A.Shaikh] PRESIDING MEMBER     [ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER ay